BreakingDailyEuropeGeneralHotWorld

Verdict in the Amanda Knox Case: Judge look dispute as a motive / Breaking News

Amanda-Knox-Case-Verdict

Who killed the British student Meredith Kercher in Perugia? According to the Judge Amanda Knox committed the crime together with her ex-boyfriend. This is clear from the court’s opinion now published – just the subject.

About three months after the conviction of Amanda Knox, the verdict has been published. The British student Meredith Kercher was stabbed to death therefore jointly by her former roommate Knox and Raffaele Sollecito whose ex-boyfriend

The killed in November 2007, Kercher had been taken ” out of two different diameters ” in the neck, the Court of Appeal Florence writes , according to the news agency Ansa in the comprehensive 337 page document . The ultimately fatal injury Kercher had been inflicted by the US-American Knox , they say.

Amanda Knox and Italian Sollecito , 30 , had been sentenced to 28 years and six months and 25 years in prison for murder in late January. According to the court more evidence suggests that Knox and Sollecito were ” in the phase immediately after the murder ” at the scene. Furthermore, the found on the bra clasp of the victim’s DNA traces of Sollecito came .

As a motive , the judges see the chairman Alessandro Nencini a dispute between Knox and Kercher . Between the two women do not have ” mutual sympathy ” passed . The American was stabbed in the desire ” to overpower and humiliate ” the victim. The hypothesis of a ausgeuferten sex game , however, was not credible.

Amanda Knox Trial:Knox criticized verdict

The 21- year-old Kercher was half naked in 2007 and with numerous stab wounds found in their shared flat in Perugia. The judge in Florence are convinced that the Ivorian Rudy Hermann Guede is the third murderer. He was convicted in a separate process legally to 16 years in prison .

Knox and Sollecito deny the fact . They had been sentenced in 2010 to 26 and 25 years in prison. However, an appeals court acquitted in 2011 after four years in prison. This acquittal , the Supreme Court conceded that saw contradictions and shortcomings on appeal. The case had to be re- negotiated in Florence and ended with the condemnation of the end of January . Now, in all probability , after the Supreme Court have to deal again with the case.

Knox stayed away from the recent process in Florence, she moved back to the United States. Whether they will be delivered in the event of final conviction , is open, but is considered unlikely . The verdict referred to them as ” not based on credible evidence or logic.” For the latest theory is simply no foundation. Giulia Bongiorno Sollecitos lawyer described the verdict as an error chain – ” from the subject of the weapon to the DNA .”

[adrotate banner=”38″]
More

Related Articles

Bir yanıt yazın

Don't Miss
Kapalı
Başa dön tuşu
Breaking News