{"id":136130,"date":"2013-05-10T11:46:28","date_gmt":"2013-05-10T08:46:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/?p=136130"},"modified":"2013-05-10T14:16:54","modified_gmt":"2013-05-10T11:16:54","slug":"son-dakika-ilhan-cihaner-mahkemeye-zorla-getirilecek-136130","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/son-dakika-ilhan-cihaner-mahkemeye-zorla-getirilecek-136130\/","title":{"rendered":"Son dakika! \u0130lhan Cihaner mahkemeye zorla getirilecek"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\u0130lhanCHP Denizli Milletvekili \u0130lhan Cihaner’in “ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi” iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya zorla getirilmesine karar verildi. \/ Son Dakika…<\/h1>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi, CHP Denizli Milletvekili \u0130lhan Cihaner’in, “ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi” iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davaya zorla getirilmesine karar verdi.
\nCihaner ve emekli Orgeneral Sald\u0131ray Berk’in de aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu 11 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, “ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi” su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131na devam edildi.
\nDuru\u015fmaya, san\u0131klar Ali Tapan, Nedim Ersan, Ersin Ergut ve Orhan Esirger ile san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131 kat\u0131l\u0131rken, Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemdeki faaliyetleriyle yarg\u0131lanan Cihaner ve duru\u015fmalardan vareste tutulan Berk kat\u0131lmad\u0131.
\nDaire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 H\u00fcseyin Eken, Cihaner ad\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan me\u015fruhatl\u0131 davetiyenin Tebligat Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n 21. maddesine g\u00f6re tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini, yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 durdurulan 3 M\u0130T mensubu hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma izni verilip verilmeyece\u011finin Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k’tan sorulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na yaz\u0131lan yaz\u0131ya ise yan\u0131t verilmedi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Eken, celse aras\u0131nda san\u0131k Ya\u015far Ba\u015f’\u0131n avukat\u0131 Mustafa \u00c7a\u011fatay \u00c7am’\u0131n m\u00fcdafilikten \u00e7ekildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin dilek\u00e7e verdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 9 Nisan’da m\u00fczekkereyle gizli tan\u0131k “F\u0131rat”\u0131n bu davada dinlenmek istedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin dilek\u00e7esinin g\u00f6nderildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayan Eken, dilek\u00e7eyi okudu.<\/p>\n

Gizli tan\u0131k “F\u0131rat” dilek\u00e7esinde, 4 Nisan’da Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na sunulmak \u00fczere Erzincan Tan\u0131k Koruma B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fine verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7ede, 2010’da Erzincan’daki Ergenekon ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda birka\u00e7 defa Erzurum Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca dinlendi\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n

Gizli tan\u0131klar\u0131n de\u015fifre edildi\u011fini, Erzincan gibi k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir ilde herkes taraf\u0131ndan isimlerinin bilinir hale geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren “F\u0131rat” bu durumun, kendisine ve ailesine maddi, manevi bir\u00e7ok zarar\u0131 oldu\u011funu savundu.<\/p>\n

“F\u0131rat”, Erzincan Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6revlilerin kendisine Yarg\u0131taydaki davayla ilgili \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n beklendi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, ancak ifadesinin \u00fczerinden \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen mahkemenin kendisini \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti.<\/p>\n

Ailesine ve kendisine y\u00f6nelik koruma karar\u0131na ek olarak, “daha farkl\u0131” bir koruma uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep eden “F\u0131rat”, “Bu konudaki ma\u011fduriyetlerimin biraz olsun giderilmesini ve yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fum tan\u0131kl\u0131ktan do\u011fan haklar\u0131mdan istifade edebilmek i\u00e7in halen Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesi’nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmek ve ifade vermek istiyorum” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Cihaner’in avukat\u0131 Mustafa G\u00fcler, m\u00fcvekkiline yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n, Tebligat Kanunu’nun 21. maddesine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc ve m\u00fcvekkilinin bug\u00fcnk\u00fc duru\u015fmaya neden kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.
\nBa\u015fkan H\u00fcseyin Eken de “T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti milletvekili olan birine ilanen tebligat yap\u0131lmaz” dedi.
\nCihaner’in di\u011fer avukat\u0131 Turgut Kazan da ya\u015fanan baz\u0131 \u00f6rneklerle, paralel soru\u015fturma boyutunun a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, “M\u00fcvekkillerimizin burada yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrken, \u0130stanbul’da \u00f6zel yetkili mahkemede gizli tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlendi\u011fini ve m\u00fcvekkilimizle ilgili sorular soruldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendik. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve emniyetin, savunma tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fck. D\u00fcn ak\u015fam o metinleri okuyunca ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u00fclkeden korktum” dedi.<\/p>\n

Bu davayla ilgili \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, \u00f6zel yetkili Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Erzurum ve Erzincan emniyetinde paralel soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc savunan Kazan, \u0130stanbul 13. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde dinlenen gizli tan\u0131klar “Munzur” ve “Efe”nin, ger\u00e7ekte bu davan\u0131n tan\u0131klar\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

Kendisi ve m\u00fcvekkilinin yoklu\u011funda gizli tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenerek, Cihaner ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda sorular soruldu\u011funu, ancak bu davaya usulen kat\u0131lma imkanlar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatan Kazan, Erzurum ve Erzincan’daki kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin de mahkemede savunma tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak dinlenen \u00d6zden Irmak’\u0131n ifadelerinin ge\u00e7ersiz saymaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti.
\nB\u00fct\u00fcn bunlar\u0131n, adil yarg\u0131lama ilkesini zedeledi\u011fini, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bunlar\u0131 yapan yarg\u0131 ve kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren Kazan, bu ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi.<\/p>\n

M\u00fcvekkilinin su\u00e7 tarihinde Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu an\u0131msatan Kazan, m\u00fcvekkili hakk\u0131nda HSYK 3. Dairesi’nce verilen soru\u015fturma izni bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, do\u011frudan 2. Daire’nin kovu\u015fturma izni verdi\u011fini, son soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n da Tunceli A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nce al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti.<\/p>\n

-Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131 talebi-<\/p>\n

Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Yasas\u0131’na g\u00f6re verilen bir soru\u015fturma izni bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in sonraki i\u015flemlerin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bunlara dayanarak yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunan Kazan, bu eksiklerin giderilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n

Kazan, bu talebin reddedilmesi durumunda, birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce m\u00fcvekkilinin Erzurum A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nce al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7erli kabul edilmesini, bunun da kabul edilmemesi durumunda, yasaya uygun soru\u015fturma izni verilmeden toplanan delillerin, yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fundan derhal beraat karar\u0131 verilmesini istedi.
\nAvukat Fatih Mehmet Yo\u011furt\u00e7u, tan\u0131k \u00d6zden Irmak’\u0131n Erzincan’da ifadesinin al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn belirlenince, m\u00fcvekkili \u015eenol Bozkurt’a duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in talimat verdiklerini bildirdi. Bozkurt’un, Irmak ile 15 y\u0131ld\u0131r tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayan Yo\u011furt\u00e7u, “M\u00fcvekkilimizin yan\u0131na askerleri alarak, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6nlendirmek i\u00e7in tan\u0131kla bulu\u015fmaya gitti\u011fi iddias\u0131 ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Tespit tutanaklar\u0131ndan, bu davayla paralel Erzincan ve Erzurum’da soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu hem mahkemenize hakaret hem de adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalidir” dedi.<\/p>\n

Yo\u011furt\u00e7u, “paralel soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fcten, yasalar\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden g\u00f6revliler hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131” istedi.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k Sald\u0131ray Berk’in avukat\u0131 Zeynel Y\u00fcksel de ayn\u0131 iddialarla ilgili su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyerek, “Daha \u00f6nceki celselerde de ayn\u0131 talepte bulunduk, ancak mahkemeniz reddetti. Belli ki mahkemenizin ret karar\u0131ndan g\u00fc\u00e7 alan g\u00f6revliler, bu i\u015flemleri daha da g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir \u015fekilde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcyorlar” diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

S\u00f6z alan san\u0131k Ali Tapan, Erzincan \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na makam telefonu olarak tahsis edilen numarayla 25 Kas\u0131m 2008 ve sonraki yak\u0131n g\u00fcnlerde san\u0131klardan Ya\u015far Ba\u015f ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin bir tutanak okundu\u011funu dile getirdi. Erzincan’a 20 Temmuz 2009’da atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydeden Tapan, “G\u00f6reve gelmemden \u00f6nceki tarihte makam telefonunu kullanmam m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil. Benden \u00f6nce g\u00f6rev yapan san\u0131klardan Recep Gen\u00e7o\u011flu, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi kendisinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duru\u015fmada s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir” dedi.<\/p>\n

-Su\u00e7 duyurusu talepleri reddedildi-<\/p>\n

Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 Mehmet Reis Koca, d\u00f6nmeyen m\u00fczekkere cevaplar\u0131n\u0131n beklenilmesini istedi. Cihaner’e \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebligat\u0131 inceleyip, beyanda bulunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan Koca \u015fu anda takdirin mahkemede oldu\u011funu ifade etti.<\/p>\n

Aran\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Daire, savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla \u00e7e\u015fitli kereler usul\u00fcne uygun davetiye tebli\u011fine ra\u011fmen duru\u015fmaya gelmeyen CHP Denizli Milletvekili Cihaner’in CMK’n\u0131n 199. maddesi uyar\u0131nca zorla getirilmesine h\u00fckmederken, 3 M\u0130T mensubu hakk\u0131ndaki kovu\u015fturma izniyle ilgili yaz\u0131n\u0131n cevab\u0131n\u0131n beklenmesini kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131.
\nSan\u0131k Ersin Ergut’un ev ve i\u015f yerinde yap\u0131lan aramada, ele ge\u00e7irilen ajandalar\u0131n incelenmek \u00fczere celbi i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan yaz\u0131n\u0131n tekrarlanmas\u0131 ve san\u0131k Ali Tapan’\u0131n avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n, Erzincan’da bulunan m\u00fchimmat\u0131n Erzincan \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 envanterinde mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilirken, san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n, baz\u0131 g\u00f6revliler hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmas\u0131 talebi reddedildi.<\/p>\n

Buna ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7ede, su\u00e7 duyurusu i\u00e7in dairenin arac\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilgili ki\u015filerin savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa do\u011frudan \u015fikayette bulunabilecekleri belirtildi.<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra delillerin okunmas\u0131na ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenilmesine ge\u00e7ilmesine karar veren daire, duru\u015fmay\u0131 erteledi.<\/p>\n

Cihaner’in avukat\u0131 Kazan, duru\u015fma sonras\u0131nda bir gazetecinin, “M\u00fcvekkiliniz zorla getirilebilir mi” sorusuna, “Bilmiyorum, g\u00f6rece\u011fiz” kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n