![\"Taksim](\"http:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/taksim_cami_projesi_iptal.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Mahkeme, her iki plan\u0131n b\u00f6lgenin \u00f6zelli\u011fini yeterince g\u00f6zetmedi\u011fi, b\u00fct\u00fcnsellikten uzak, korumaya en \u00e7ok muhta\u00e7 alanlar\u0131n \u00f6zelle\u015ftirme, kentsel yenileme veya turizm alan\u0131 ilan edilerek koruma plan\u0131 kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi pek \u00e7ok gerek\u00e7eyle iptal karar\u0131n\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle verdi. Karar sonras\u0131 belediye 6 ay i\u00e7inde, mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131ndaki itirazlar dikkate alarak planlar\u0131 yeniden yapmak zorunda. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te, Beyo\u011flu\u2019ndaki imar hareketleri, kurul kararlar\u0131 onay\u0131yla \u2018Ge\u00e7ici Yap\u0131la\u015fma Ko\u015fullar\u0131\u2019yla y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek.<\/p>\n
H\u00fcrriyet gazetesinden Mustafa K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck’\u00fcn haberine g\u00f6re Cihangir G\u00fczelle\u015ftirme Derne\u011fi ve Galata Derne\u011fi\u2019nin, Beyo\u011flu Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Turizm Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aleyhine 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava 25 Eyl\u00fcl 2013\u2019te oybirli\u011fiyle sonu\u00e7land\u0131. Karak\u00f6y\u2019deki Mimarlar Odas\u0131 B\u00fcy\u00fckkent \u015eubesi\u2019nde, Beyo\u011flu Semt Dernekleri Platformu \u00fcyeleri bas\u0131n toplant\u0131s\u0131yla karar\u0131 kamuoyuna a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Beyo\u011flu Semt Dernekleri Platformu S\u00f6zc\u00fcs\u00fc Cem T\u00fcz\u00fcn, 1993 y\u0131l\u0131nda Beyo\u011flu\u2019nun \u00f6nemli bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn \u201cKentsel Koruma Alan\u0131\u201d olarak ilan edildi\u011fini ve yasa gere\u011fi 6 ay i\u00e7erisinde bir koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 imar plan\u0131 haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi: \u201cAncak bu gereklili\u011fin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 1994 y\u0131l\u0131 ilkbahar\u0131ndan itibaren bu koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 imar plan\u0131 yapmakla sorumlu olan b\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir belediyesinde Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan, Ali M\u00fcfit G\u00fcrtuna ve Kadir Topba\u015f ile Beyo\u011flu\u2019nda ise Nusret Bayraktar, Kadir Topba\u015f ve Ahmet Misbah Demircan d\u00f6nemlerinde 18 y\u0131l boyunca bu imar plan\u0131 haz\u0131rlanmad\u0131. Beyo\u011flu bir anlamda kaderine terk edildi. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7erisinde \u2018Ge\u00e7ici Yap\u0131la\u015fma Ko\u015fullar\u0131\u2019yla Beyo\u011flu\u2019ndaki imar hareketleri y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Bu durumda \u00e7ok say\u0131da r\u00fc\u015fvet, yolsuzluk yollar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. Ka\u00e7ak yap\u0131la\u015fma ve g\u00f6z yummalar oldu. Beyo\u011flu\u2019nun bir\u00e7ok mahalleside \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fcnt\u00fc haline getirildi. Tarlaba\u015f\u0131 bunun en bariz \u00f6rneklerinden biridir. Ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde Bedrettin Mahallesi\u2019nde yurtta\u015flar\u0131n kendi oturduklar\u0131 evlere bir \u00e7ivi dahi \u00e7akt\u0131rmad\u0131lar. 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda aniden bir imar plan\u0131 haz\u0131rland\u0131. Koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen 1\/1000 ve 1\/5000\u2019lik planlar ard arda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. Buna ili\u015fkin bizim Beyo\u011flu\u2019ndaki semt dernekleri olarak ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z \u00e7e\u015fitli s\u00fcre\u00e7ler oldu. Belediyeye katk\u0131lar koymaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131k. \u0130mar planlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda itirazlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 yapt\u0131k. Akabinde yarg\u0131ya ba\u015fvurmak zorunda kald\u0131k.\u201d<\/p>\n
Avukat Pervin \u00c7elik de 2009 ve 2011 y\u0131llar\u0131nda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f 1\/5000 ve 1\/1000 imar planlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda dava a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi: \u201c2.5 y\u0131l s\u00fcren mahkeme sonunda, taraf\u0131m\u0131za d\u00fcn tebli\u011f edilen kararda, her iki imar plan\u0131n\u0131n da iptal edildi\u011fini \u00f6\u011frendik. Bu karar planlar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc ortadan kald\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren art\u0131k uygulamas\u0131 durmu\u015ftur. Beyo\u011flu\u2019nda bu imar planlar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil. Bundan sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken \u015fey, bu karar\u0131n muhatab\u0131 olan \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi, Beyo\u011flu Belediyesi ve yine koruma ama\u00e7l\u0131 imar plan\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, bu planlar\u0131 onaylamak zorunda olan koruma kurullar\u0131n\u0131n, mahkeme karar\u0131nda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere uygun olarak yeni 1\/5000 ve 1\/1000 planlar\u0131n\u0131 yeniden haz\u0131rlamas\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda \u00f6zet olarak \u015funu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Bu planlar\u0131n koruma amac\u0131ndan ve korumaya ili\u015fkin yasal mevzuattaki kurallara uzak oldu\u011fu, yasal mevzuatta aranan kurallara da uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade ediliyor. Somut birka\u00e7 \u00f6rnek vermek gerekirse, turizmin \u00f6n plana \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ama bunu yaparken Beyo\u011flu\u2019nun yerel \u00f6zelli\u011finin g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edildi\u011fi, k\u00fclt\u00fcr odakl\u0131 turizm yerine ticaret ve hizmet odakl\u0131 turizme a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k veren bir planlaman\u0131n tercih edildi\u011fi, \u00f6zelli\u011fi gelir d\u00fczeyi y\u00fcksek turistlere y\u00f6nelik bir planlaman\u0131n tercih edildi\u011fi, oysa b\u00f6lgenin burada ya\u015fayan ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan insanlarla kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bir renklili\u011fi oldu\u011fu ve bunun ihmal edildi\u011fi, burada ya\u015fayan insanlar\u0131n kentten ve Beyo\u011flu\u2019ndan uzakla\u015ft\u0131rmaya y\u00f6nelik kararlar i\u00e7erdi\u011fini ifade ediyor. Bunlar \u00f6zellikle son d\u00f6nemde toplumun tepkisini \u00e7eken gerek\u00e7eleri de ortaya koyuyor. Kentlerin, i\u00e7inde ya\u015fayan insanlardan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak planlanamayac\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir kez daha bize g\u00f6stermi\u015f oldu. Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 itibariyle bizim i\u00e7in \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli. Beyo\u011flu il\u00e7esine ili\u015fkin bir plan\u0131n iptalini \u00f6ng\u00f6rse de sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bundan sonra idarelere g\u00f6sterece\u011fi yol a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bundan sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken planlama s\u00fcrecinde burada ya\u015fayan halk\u0131n bu s\u00fcrece kat\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fart. Bu k\u0131saca kat\u0131l\u0131m ilkesi olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131yor ve g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n
Tarlaba\u015f\u0131 \u00f6zel bir stat\u00fcde yenileme alan\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in plan\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndayd\u0131. Yine meydandaki ula\u015f\u0131m projesi de bu dava konusu etti\u011fimiz planlardan daha sonraki bir tarihte planda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tadilat olarak g\u00fcndeme geldi. Zaten o planla ilgili olarak ba\u015fka bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f ba\u015fka bir iptal karar\u0131 var. Bu g\u00fcne kadar yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f uygulamalar dava konusu edilmediyse devam edecek, dava konusu edilmi\u015f veya edilecekse bu karar gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek durdurulabilir.\u201d<\/p>\n
TMMOB \u015eehir Planc\u0131lar\u0131 Odas\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u015eubesi Sekreteri Akif Burak Atlar da mahkeme karar\u0131yla birlikte, Galatasaray Lisesi\u2019nin yan\u0131ndaki a\u00e7\u0131k alana \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen katl\u0131 otopark projesi ile Taksim Meydan\u0131\u2019ndaki Sular \u0130daresi\u2019nin arkas\u0131nda bulunan otoparka yap\u0131lacak olan dini tesisin de in\u015fas\u0131n\u0131 iptal etti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130stanbul 10\u2019uncu \u0130dare Mahkemesi, Taksim Cami projesi ve Galatasaray Katl\u0131 Otopark\u0131 dahil bir\u00e7ok projeyi bar\u0131nd\u0131ran Beyo\u011flu Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131’n\u0131 iptal etti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":155417,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6155,5005,6202,349,6805],"tags":[116788,149673,114732],"class_list":["post-155416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","category-manset","category-politika","category-son-dakika","category-turkiye","tag-taksim-cami","tag-taksim-cami-projesi","tag-taksim-projesi"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155416\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155417"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}