![\"\u0130smail](\"http:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/ismail_unal_konusma_249829-610x354.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Be\u015fikta\u015f Postas\u0131’n\u0131n haberi \u015f\u00f6yle;<\/strong><\/p>\n Hat\u0131rlanaca\u011f\u0131 gibi Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u0130smail \u00dcnal\u2019\u0131n 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda d\u00f6nemin Radyospor Genel Yay\u0131n Y\u00f6netmeni Bar\u0131\u015f Ert\u00fcl ile Futbol Cafe program\u0131n\u0131n konuklar\u0131 H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay ile Atilla Aksel\u2019e a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakaret davas\u0131 \u0130stanbul 5. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan reddedilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n Davaya konu olan olay \u015f\u00f6yle geli\u015fmi\u015fti:<\/p>\n Bar\u0131\u015f Ert\u00fcl ve H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay, Ortak\u00f6y futbol sahas\u0131n\u0131n imara a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 uzun s\u00fcre radyo program\u0131nda ara\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015flar ve Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 imar komisyon ba\u015fkan\u0131na planlarda spor alan\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00fcken yerin ancak ayn\u0131 yerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131na futbol sahas\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 kayd\u0131yle imara a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 canl\u0131 yay\u0131nda itiraf ettirmi\u015flerdi. Be\u015fikta\u015f belediyesi imar komisyon ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n dediklerini onaylayan \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir belediyesi CHP Grup Ba\u015fkan vekili Kemal Akar da olay\u0131 do\u011frulayarak bu spor alan\u0131n\u0131n imara a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndaki problemleri teyit etmi\u015fti. Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u0130smail \u00dcnal ise programa kat\u0131larak iddialara yan\u0131t vermek yerine Bar\u0131\u015f Ert\u00fcl, H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay ve Atilla Aksel\u2019e hakaret davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n Gerek\u00e7eli kararda ders olacak ifadeler<\/p>\n \u0130stanbul 5. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eli kararda \u00e7ok \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 ifadeler yer ald\u0131. Hakim Fevziye Bacak taraf\u0131ndan kaleme al\u0131nan gerek\u00e7eli kararda Ortak\u00f6y spor sahas\u0131n\u0131n imara a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan yay\u0131nlar hakk\u0131nda \u015fu tespitlere yer verildi;<\/p>\n “Bilgi ve kanaatlere ula\u015fma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, medya ile ilgilidir; Medyan\u0131n halka bu t\u00fcr bilgiyi ve fikirleri aktarmas\u0131n\u0131n olanakl\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. A\u0130HM, bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn i\u00e7inde, halk\u0131n \u00f6zellikle kamu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendiren konularda yeterli bi\u00e7imde bilgilendirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n da oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131ndad\u0131r. A\u0130HM (Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi), bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6nemini vurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir karar\u0131nda ‘Bas\u0131n\u0131n sadece bu t\u00fcr bilgi ve fikirleri a\u00e7\u0131klama g\u00f6revi yoktur: Halk\u0131n da bunlara ula\u015fma hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda, bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, do\u011frulu\u011fu denetlenebilir olgu veya verilerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, do\u011frulu\u011funun kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olmayacak fikir, ele\u015ftiri ve spek\u00fclasyonlar\u0131n dile getirilmesi 10. madde \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Somut olayda, radyo yay\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finden olaylar zincirinin b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funa ve davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir iftira kampanyas\u0131 ba\u015flatmak \u00fczere tasarland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair hi\u00e7bir kan\u0131t yoktur. Halk\u0131n bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7 do\u011frultusunda halk\u0131 bilgilendiren imar plan\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, bu de\u011fi\u015fiklikle kamuya ait alanlar\u0131n gasp edildi\u011fi, ranta d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc birilerine verildi\u011fi ifade edildi\u011fi ve bunun sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ve nedenlerini izaha y\u00f6nelik bir tak\u0131m yeterli olgulara dayal\u0131 yay\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 yay\u0131nc\u0131n\u0131n, A\u0130HS’in 10. maddesi ile teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nan yay\u0131n\u0131nda bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131, ki\u015fisel bir de\u011ferlendirme ile dile getirmi\u015f olsa da, yukar\u0131daki b\u00f6l\u00fcmde izah edildi\u011fi \u00fczere yay\u0131n i\u00e7in kanaatini olu\u015fturan yeterli olgular\u0131n mevcuduyeti kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ele\u015ftirel de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmesinin engellenmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, verili\u015f \u015fekli bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr ger\u00e7eklik kapsam\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve tazminat hakk\u0131 do\u011furacak nitelikte yay\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n Mahkemenin a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tamam\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yle;<\/p>\n Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; ger\u00e7eklere ayk\u0131r\u0131 usuls\u00fczl\u00fck ve yolsuzluk iddialar\u0131yla m\u00fcvekkilleri \u0130smail \u00dcnal’\u0131n siyasal ve sosyal sayg\u0131nl\u0131k ve onuruna; genel onur ve \u015f\u00f6hretine ve ki\u015filik de\u011ferlerine haks\u0131z ve a\u011f\u0131r tecav\u00fczler nedeniyle manevi zarar\u0131n telafisi ve mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn ilgili radyo ve bas\u0131n yoluyla kamuya duyurulmas\u0131na, sosyal ve ki\u015fisel kimli\u011fi, onur ve sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ki\u015filik de\u011ferleri a\u011f\u0131r derecede zedelenmi\u015f bulundu\u011fundan olay tarihi ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 olan 18-01-2008 tarihinden itibaren kanuni faizi ile birlikte olu\u015fan manevi zarar\u0131n giderimi i\u00e7in 250 bin TL tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkillerinin amat\u00f6r bir futbol kul\u00fcb\u00fc olan Ortak\u00f6y Spor Kul\u00fcb\u00fc ile alakala ve kul\u00fcp taraf\u0131ndan spor alan\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131lan arazinin imara a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131yla ilgili haz\u0131rlay\u0131p sunduklar\u0131 program\u0131n hi\u00e7bir safahat\u0131nda, davac\u0131 \u0130smail \u00dcnal’\u0131n \u015fahsiyetine, onuruna ve ki\u015fili\u011fine hakaret say\u0131lacak tem bir s\u00f6z dahi sarf etmediklerini, konu ile ilgisi bulundu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclen herkesin gerek canl\u0131 telefon ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 gerekse program konu\u011fu olarak dinlendi\u011fini mevzunun derinlemesine tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcvekkillerinin e\u015fit ve ilkeli yay\u0131n gere\u011fi, konunun taraflar\u0131n\u0131n her zaman i\u00e7in s\u00f6z hakk\u0131 bulundu\u011fu defaatle dile getirdiklerini. Ancak davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n m\u00fcvekkillerinin bu taleplerine hi\u00e7bir kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k vermediklerini, m\u00fcvekkillerinin T\u00fcrk futbolunun sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 dile getirdiklerini ve davac \u0131 yan\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi \u00fczere davac\u0131 \u0130smail \u00dcnal’\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na halel getirecek hi\u00e7bir konu\u015fman\u0131n yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bu nedenlerden dolay\u0131 maddi ve hukuki mesnetten yoksun davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Deliller ve Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n Davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu manevi tazminat davas\u0131nda, daval\u0131 radyo futbol cafe isimli program\u0131n ard\u0131 ard\u0131na devam eden yay\u0131nlar\u0131nda \u201ckamuya a\u00e7\u0131k olarak g\u00f6sterilen a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 spor alan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterilen yer ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kamuya ait bir spor alan\u0131 \u00f6zel spor alan\u0131 ve ticaret alan\u0131 olarak ranta d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr, spor alan\u0131 buharla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k spor alan\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel spor alan\u0131na \u00e7evrilmesi ve ranta a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131nda bir sak\u0131nca g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediyesi, \u0130smail \u00dcnal’a soruyorum, kafas\u0131na yast\u0131\u011fa huzurla koyuyor mu?\u201d H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay’\u0131n Serdar Bilgili \u0130smail \u00dcnal’\u0131 belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 yapan ki\u015fi, \u015fehirler b\u00f6yle talan ediliyor futbol y\u00f6neticisi kisvesiyle giriyorlar bir yerlere imtiyaz kazan\u0131yorlar. Sahalar\u0131 talan ediyorlra, bu in\u015faat\u0131n sahibi kim. Kime rant kime pe\u015fke\u015f \u00e7ekildi, yalan bilgi veriyorsunuz, Serdar Bilgili’nin asistan\u0131 belediye ba\u015fkan\u0131 olduktan sonra bu pe\u015fke\u015f \u00e7ekilmi\u015f. Halk\u0131n g\u00f6z\u00fcnde bu arsa pe\u015fke\u015fe gidiyor, kamunun sahas\u0131n\u0131 gasp edin, 1 milyar Euro kazan\u0131n, Ortak\u00f6y’de pe\u015fke\u015f var.\u201d Atilla Aksel’in \u201cplanlarda \u00e7ok ilgin\u00e7tir spor alan\u0131 olarak g\u00f6z\u00fckmesine ra\u011fmen Musevi mezarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131ndaki alan bu d\u00f6nemde imara a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yani dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu sporun i\u00e7inden geldi\u011fini iddia eden insanlar bu rantlara boyun e\u011fmer durumunda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Benzer daha y\u00fczlerce dosya var bizim elimizde bunlar\u0131n hepsi kenti ya\u011fmalayanlar\u0131n. Elimiz yakas\u0131ndard\u0131r. Be\u015fikta\u015f’\u0131 rant haline getirenlerin ellerimiz yakas\u0131ndad\u0131r, elimizde onlarca dosya var, bunlar yoldan tuttuklar\u0131 kalfa tabir edilen birine bu planlar\u0131 \u00e7izdirdiler bu kadar da duyars\u0131z ve g\u00f6z\u00fc kara \u015fekilde davran\u0131yorlar, rant i\u00e7in yap\u0131yorlar. T\u00fcy\u00fc bitmedik yetimin hakk\u0131n\u0131 yemek i\u00e7in yap\u0131yorlar.\u201d bu ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yay\u0131nlar\u0131n daima hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu yay\u0131nlar\u0131n ne d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce ne de bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fini, bu \u015fekilde davac\u0131n\u0131n manevi \u015fahsiyetinin haks\u0131z ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde tecav\u00fcze u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle daval\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funa h\u00fckmedilmesine karar verilmesine dair manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n Bilgi alma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bili toplama ve m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan b\u00fct\u00fcn kanuni kaynaklardan bilgi ara\u015ft\u0131rma hakk\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7erir. A\u0130HS’in 10. maddesinde teminat alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bilgi ve kanaatlere ula\u015fma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, medya ile ilgilidir; Medyan\u0131n halka bu t\u00fcr bilgiyi ve fikirleri aktarmas\u0131n\u0131n olanakl\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. A\u0130HM, bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn i\u00e7inde, halk\u0131n \u00f6zellikle kamu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendiren konularda yeterli bi\u00e7imde bilgilendirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n da oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131ndad\u0131r. A\u0130HM (Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi), bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00f6nemini vurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir karar\u0131nda ‘Her ne kadar bas\u0131n, ki\u015finin \u015f\u00f6hretinin korunmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da konulmu\u015f s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 a\u015fmamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olsa da, kamu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131 ile ilgili olan ba\u015fka alanlarda oldu\u011fu gibi, siyasi konularda da bilgi ve fikirleri a\u00e7\u0131klamam bas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revidir. Sadece bas\u0131n\u0131n bu t\u00fcr bilgi ve fikirleri a\u00e7\u0131klama g\u00f6revi yoktur: Halk\u0131n da bunlara ula\u015fma hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda, bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, do\u011frulu\u011fu denetlenebilir olgu veya verilerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, do\u011frulu\u011funun kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olmayacak fikir, ele\u015ftiri ve spek\u00fclasyonlar\u0131n dile getirilmesi 10. madde \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, ba\u015fta siyasi alanda ifade edilmi\u015f olanlar olmak \u00fczere, de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131 demokratik bir toplum a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ya\u015famsal \u00f6nemi haiz olan kanaat \u00e7o\u011fulculu\u011funun bir gere\u011fi olarak \u00f6zel bir korumadan yararlan\u0131r. Somut olayda, radyo yay\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finden olaylar zincirinin b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funa ve davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda bir iftira kampanyas\u0131 ba\u015flatmak \u00fczere tasarland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair hi\u00e7bir kan\u0131t yoktur. Halk\u0131n bilgi sahibi olmas\u0131 i\u00e7in, me\u015fru bir ama\u00e7 do\u011frultusunda halk\u0131 bilgilendiren imar plan\u0131 de\u011f\u015fikli\u011finin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, bu de\u011fi\u015fiklikle kamuya ait alanlar\u0131n gasp edildi\u011fi, ranta d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc birilerine verildi\u011fi ifade edildi\u011fi ve bunun sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ve nedenlerini izaha y\u00f6nelik bir tak\u0131m yeterli olgulara dayal\u0131 yay\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 yay\u0131nc\u0131n\u0131n, A\u0130HS’in 10. maddesi ile teminat al\u0131tna al\u0131nan yay\u0131n\u0131nda bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131, ki\u015fisel bir de\u011ferlendirme ile dile getirmi\u015f olsa da, yukar\u0131daki \u00f6l\u00fcmde izah edildi\u011fi \u00fczere yay\u0131n i\u00e7in kanaatini olu\u015fturan yeterli olgular\u0131n mevcuduyeti kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, ele\u015ftirel de\u011fer yarg\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmesinin engellenmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, verili\u015f \u015fekli bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr ger\u00e7eklik kapsam\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve tazminat hakk\u0131 do\u011furacak nitelikte yay\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n H\u00fck\u00fcm: Be\u015fikta\u015f Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u0130smail \u00dcnal’\u0131n, Ortak\u00f6y Spor sahas\u0131n\u0131n imara a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcndeme getiren Bar\u0131\u015f Ert\u00fcl, H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay ve Atilla Aksel’e a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakaret davas\u0131 reddedilmi\u015fti. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda ders gibi ifadeler yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":175787,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6155,5005,6667,6202],"tags":[66170,17640,8723,17639,108633,17641,17647,17644,17645,2268,145835,17648,17643,145836,10888],"class_list":["post-157619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","category-manset","category-medya","category-politika","tag-atilla-aksel","tag-baris-ertul","tag-chp","tag-futbol-cafe","tag-gerekceli-karar","tag-hurser-tekinoktay","tag-imar-komisyon-baskani","tag-imar-usulsuzlukleri","tag-imar-yolsuzluklari","tag-ismail-unal","tag-ismail-unal-baris-ertul","tag-kemal-akar","tag-ortakoy-futbol-sahasi","tag-ortakoy-sahasi","tag-radyospor"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157619\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/175787"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n1 \u2013 Davan\u0131n reddine,
\n2- Davac\u0131ya taraf\u00e7a yat\u0131r\u0131lan 3.375 TL pe\u015fin har\u00e7tan 24.30 TL red harc\u0131n\u0131n mahsubu ile bakiye 3.350 TL harc\u0131 nkarar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde talep halinde davac\u0131ya iadesine,
\n3 \u2013 Davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
\n4 \u2013 Karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Av. As. \u00dcc. Tar. Nazara al\u0131narak hesaplanan 1.320 TL vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p daval\u0131lara verilmesine,
\nDair, taraf vekillerinin y\u00fczlerine kar\u015f\u0131 karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup usulen anlat\u0131ld\u0131.”<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"