{"id":167921,"date":"2014-06-19T14:45:56","date_gmt":"2014-06-19T11:45:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/?p=167921"},"modified":"2014-06-19T14:45:56","modified_gmt":"2014-06-19T11:45:56","slug":"mehmet-baransunun-bavuluyla-baslamisti-balyozda-yeniden-yargilama-sureci-basliyor-167921","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/mehmet-baransunun-bavuluyla-baslamisti-balyozda-yeniden-yargilama-sureci-basliyor-167921\/","title":{"rendered":"Mehmet Baransu’nun bavuluyla ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131! Balyoz’da yeniden yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci ba\u015fl\u0131yor"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Mehmet<\/p>\n

Taraf gazetesi muhabiri Mehmet Baransu’ya esrarengiz bir \u015fekilde gelen bavuldaki delil iddialar\u0131yla ba\u015flayan Balyoz davas\u0131nda art\u0131k yeni bir s\u00fcrece girildi. Balyoz’da yeniden yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci ba\u015fl\u0131yor.<\/h1>\n

D\u00f6nemin 1. Ordu Komutan\u0131 \u00c7etin Do\u011fan’\u0131n liderli\u011finde 2003’te haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen darbe planlar\u0131ndan olu\u015fan ve san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131k s\u0131k iddianamedeki tutars\u0131zl\u0131klar ve sahte CD delilleri iddialar\u0131 nedeniyle yarg\u0131 tarihinin en tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 davalar\u0131ndan biri olan Balyoz Plan\u0131 Davas\u0131’nda, 4,5 y\u0131l\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yeniden yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci ba\u015fl\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye, darbe plan\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen “Balyoz” ad\u0131n\u0131 ilk kez Taraf gazetesinin 20 Ocak 2010 tarihli haberiyle duydu. D\u00f6nemin 1. Ordu Komutan\u0131 \u00c7etin Do\u011fan’\u0131n liderli\u011finde, darbe zeminini haz\u0131rlama ama\u00e7l\u0131 “\u00c7ar\u015faf”, “Sakal”, “Suga” ve “Oraj” kod adl\u0131 eylem planlar\u0131ndan olu\u015ftu\u011fu savunulan Balyoz Harekat Plan\u0131 ile ilgili belge, cd ve ses kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin dosyalar\u0131n 30 Ocak 2010’da savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa bir gazeteci taraf\u0131ndan bavulla teslim edilmesinin ard\u0131ndan da yarg\u0131 s\u00fcreci ba\u015flad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemelerinin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yerine kurulan \u00d6zel Yetkili Mahkemelerde yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde, 250’si tutuklu 365 san\u0131k, Silivri Cezaevi i\u00e7inde kurulan mahkemede savunma yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131lamalarda, 5 bin sayfal\u0131k belgelerde Fatih ve Beyaz\u0131t camilerinde bomba patlat\u0131larak h\u00fck\u00fcmetin s\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim ilan etmeye zorlanmas\u0131, Yunanistan hava sahas\u0131 \u00fczerinde bir T\u00fcrk jetinin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclerek halk\u0131n galeyana getirilmesi ve darbe sonras\u0131 \u00f6nceden ismi belirlenen ki\u015filerin tutuklanmas\u0131 gibi planlar\u0131n oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n

\u00d6zel yetkili savc\u0131lar\u0131n incelemesinden sonra 22 \u015eubat 2010’da ilk g\u00f6zalt\u0131lar yap\u0131ld\u0131. \u0130lk etapta, \u00c7etin Do\u011fan’\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu 194 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. \u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava, Eski\u015fehir’de ve G\u00f6lc\u00fck Donanma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi iddia edilen belgelerle ilgili soru\u015fturma sonucu a\u00e7\u0131lan iki davayla birle\u015ftirildi.<\/p>\n

250’si tutuklu 365 muvazzaf ve emekli T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri personelinin yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n ilk duru\u015fmas\u0131 16 Aral\u0131k 2010’da ba\u015flad\u0131.<\/p>\n

-Dijital deliller hep tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131<\/p>\n

Silivri Ceza ve \u0130nfaz Kurumunda kurulan mahkemede g\u00f6r\u00fclen davalarda, san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131, davaya dayanak CD’deki “dijital deliller”in \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funu ispatlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Savunmalarda, “San\u0131klardan SAT Komandosu Albay Ali T\u00fcrk\u015fen’in, dijital belgeyi kaydetti\u011fi \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen g\u00fcn ve saatte TRT’de su alt\u0131nda canl\u0131 yay\u0131nda oldu\u011fu, planlarda belirtilen baz\u0131 sokak ve kurum adlar\u0131n\u0131n plan\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen 2003’te o isimleri ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, CD’lerdeki word belgelerinin 2003 tarihli oldu\u011fu ancak belgelerde kullan\u0131lan yaz\u0131 fontlar\u0131n\u0131n Microsoft taraf\u0131ndan Ofis 2007 i\u00e7in geli\u015ftirildi\u011fi” s\u0131k s\u0131k dile getirildi.<\/p>\n

Mahkeme, 21 Eyl\u00fcl 2012’de \u00c7etin Do\u011fan, \u00d6zden \u00d6rnek ve \u0130brahim F\u0131rt\u0131na’n\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu 365 san\u0131ktan 325’ini “T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti icra vekilleri heyetini, cebren \u0131skat veya vazife g\u00f6rmekten cebren men etmek” su\u00e7undan a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapse mahkum etti ancak “eksik te\u015febb\u00fcs” nedeniyle cezalarda indirime gitti.<\/p>\n

-Yarg\u0131tay’daki temyiz s\u00fcreci<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul 10. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 7 Ocak 2013’te a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131, temyiz incelemesi i\u00e7in 27 \u015eubat 2013’te Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, yakla\u015f\u0131k 4 ay s\u00fcren incelemenin ard\u0131ndan onama istemli tebli\u011fnamesini haz\u0131rlayarak, 17 Haziran 2013’te dosyay\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderdi.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinde 15 Temmuz’da ba\u015flayan savunmalar, 16 A\u011fustos’ta 2013’te tamamland\u0131. B\u00f6ylelikle avukatlar\u0131 dinleyen Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi heyeti, 54 g\u00fcn dosyay\u0131 inceleyerek, 9 Ekim 2013 \u00c7ar\u015famba g\u00fcn\u00fc karar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamak \u00fczere duru\u015fmay\u0131 bitirdi.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tayda da san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n savunmalar\u0131, a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olarak dijital verilerin sahteli\u011fi iddias\u0131 ve delil kabul edilemeyece\u011fi \u00fczerinde yo\u011funla\u015ft\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca verilerde zaman \u00e7eli\u015fkileri oldu\u011fu ve darbe plan\u0131n\u0131 durdurdu\u011fu iddia edilen d\u00f6nemin Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 emekli Orgeneral Hilmi \u00d6zk\u00f6k ve d\u00f6nemin Kara Kuvvetleri Komutan\u0131 emekli Orgeneral Ayta\u00e7 Yalman’\u0131n tan\u0131k olarak dinlenilmesi isteklerinin defalarca yerel mahkemece reddedilmesinin de savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali oldu\u011fu iddia edildi.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay tarihinin en uzun ve kalabal\u0131k duru\u015fmas\u0131nda, 9. Ceza Dairesi, 1 ay s\u00fcren 17 oturumda, 96 san\u0131k avukat\u0131n\u0131n 120 saat s\u00fcren savunmas\u0131n\u0131 dinledi.<\/p>\n

-Karar 9 Ekim 2013’te \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemenin ard\u0131ndan karar\u0131n\u0131 9 Ekim 2013’te a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Daire, oy birli\u011fiyle ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararla, emekli orgeneraller \u00c7etin Do\u011fan, Halil \u0130brahim F\u0131rt\u0131na ve emekli oramiral \u00d6zden \u00d6rnek, emekli orgeneraller Ergin Saygun, Bilgin Balanl\u0131, \u015e\u00fckr\u00fc Sar\u0131\u015f\u0131k ve MHP Milletvekili Engin Alan’\u0131n aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu 237 san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen mahkumiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131 onad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Daire’nin 65 sayfal\u0131k gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 da ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. Gerek\u00e7ede, \u00c7etin Do\u011fan’\u0131n iktidar\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmetten uzakla\u015ft\u0131rma ve bu ama\u00e7 i\u00e7in TSK’da ayr\u0131 bir hiyerar\u015fik yap\u0131lanmaya gitme karar\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve dijital delillerin ele ge\u00e7irilmesinden sonra kolluk veya adli makamlar elinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Dijital delillerin yap\u0131s\u0131 gere\u011fi manip\u00fclasyona a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funun bilindi\u011fi vurgulanan gerek\u00e7ede, dijital delillerin de sonu\u00e7ta ceza muhakemesi sisteminde bir ispat arac\u0131 oldu\u011funa i\u015faret edildi. T\u00fcm deliller gibi dijital delillerin de san\u0131klar ya da ba\u015fkalar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7e\u015fitli \u015fekillerde gizlenmeye, de\u011fi\u015ftirilmeye, bozulmaya elveri\u015fli oldu\u011fu ifade edilen gerek\u00e7ede \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n

“San\u0131klar veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan delillerin yok edilme, silinme, gizlenme, de\u011fi\u015ftirilme veya bozulmak istenmesi o kadar ola\u011fand\u0131r ki yasa koyucu maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck bir tehlike olu\u015fturan bu fiilleri ayr\u0131 bir su\u00e7 olarak veya nitelikli hal olarak d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir. Ancak dijital delillerin de\u011fi\u015ftirilebilme kolayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve sanal olu\u015fundan hareketle h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayacak oldu\u011funun ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi delil olgusuna ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Kald\u0131 ki dijital deliller T\u00fcrk Ceza Muhakemesi sisteminde ilk kez bu davayla g\u00fcndeme gelmi\u015f olmay\u0131p ge\u00e7mi\u015fte de pek \u00e7ok davada tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

H\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan dijital delillerin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na, akla ve mant\u0131\u011fa uygun bulundu\u011fu, b\u00f6ylelikle de hukuka uygun deliller olarak h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilen gerek\u00e7ede, bu nedenlerle dijital delillerin mevcut halleriyle h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

-Yarg\u0131tay BM’nin keyfi tutuklama raporunu da esas almad\u0131<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131taydaki duru\u015fmalar s\u00fcr\u00fcrken, Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler Genel Kurulu \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Konseyi Keyfi Tutuklamalar \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma Grubu, Balyoz Davas\u0131 san\u0131klar\u0131yla ilgili raporunu a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Raporda, “Balyoz davas\u0131nda tutuklu yarg\u0131lanan 250 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n keyfi oldu\u011fu ve Uluslararas\u0131 Medeni ve Siyasi Haklar S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin 9. ve 14. maddeleri ile \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Evrensel Bildirgesi’nin 9, 10 ve 11. maddelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ancak Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda, Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Konseyi Keyfi Tutuklamalar \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma Grubu’nun dava g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcrken, dava kapsam\u0131ndaki tutuklamalar\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lama normlar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda keyfili\u011fine de\u011finen ve yarg\u0131sal bir niteli\u011fi bulunmayan karar\u0131n\u0131n daire bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz s\u00fcrecini bekleyen san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131 karar\u0131n \u00fczerinden 1 ay ge\u00e7tikten sonra Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n

Avukatlar\u0131n 9 Kas\u0131m 2013’te yapt\u0131klar\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuruda k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7 al\u0131nmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla avukatlar ve san\u0131k yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6n\u00fcnde ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 “Adalet N\u00f6beti”nin 45. g\u00fcn\u00fcnde ailelere Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme’den m\u00fcjdeli haber geldi. Anayasa Mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi ihlal ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama karar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan san\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci yeniden ba\u015flayacak.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Taraf gazetesi muhabiri Mehmet Baransu’ya esrarengiz bir \u015fekilde gelen bavuldaki delil iddialar\u0131yla ba\u015flayan Balyoz davas\u0131nda art\u0131k yeni bir s\u00fcrece girildi. Balyoz’da yeniden yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci ba\u015fl\u0131yor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":167922,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6155,5005,6667,6202,6805],"tags":[11271,165053,36918,165054,152201,12467,5270,5271],"class_list":["post-167921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","category-manset","category-medya","category-politika","category-turkiye","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi-balyoz","tag-balyoz-davasi","tag-balyoz-davasi-anayasa-mahkemesi","tag-balyoz-yeniden-yargilama","tag-mehmet-baransu","tag-taraf","tag-taraf-gazetesi"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167921\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/167922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}