– Ankara 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 2010 KPSS’nin “Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr” k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin karar\u0131nda, “S\u0131nava ili\u015fkin Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr sorular\u0131n\u0131n da iptal edilen E\u011fitim Bilimleri k\u0131sm\u0131 gibi s\u0131navdan \u00f6nce ba\u015fka ki\u015filerin eline ge\u00e7ti\u011fi sonu\u00e7 ve kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.” denildi.<\/p>\n
Ankara 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin oy birli\u011fiyle ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararda, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca akademisyen bilirki\u015filere yapt\u0131r\u0131lan incelemeler ile dava konusu olaya ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalarda ald\u0131r\u0131lan teknik raporlara yer verildi.<\/p>\n
Kararda, 10-11 Temmuz 2010’da yap\u0131lan KPSS’de \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015finin e\u011fitim bilimleri testinde tam puan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucunda baz\u0131 usuls\u00fczl\u00fcklerin tespit edildi\u011fi hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131. Bu tespite g\u00f6re \u015fimdiye kadar yap\u0131lan t\u00fcm s\u0131navlardan farkl\u0131 olarak bu s\u0131navda genel da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlat\u0131lan kararda, KPSS e\u011fitim bilimleri s\u0131nav\u0131nda 100 ve \u00fczeri puan alan adaylar\u0131n standart sapmalar\u0131n\u0131n genelde 1-2 oldu\u011fu ancak bu s\u0131navda 5-6 olarak tespit edildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n
Y\u00fczde 100 do\u011fru say\u0131s\u0131na son 3 y\u0131ldaki s\u0131navlarda rastlanmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu s\u0131navda 350 ki\u015finin y\u00fczde 100 do\u011fru say\u0131s\u0131na ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilen kararda, t\u00fcm bu verilerin ola\u011fan d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir durumu g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, bu sonu\u00e7lara g\u00f6re yap\u0131lacak uygulamalarda telafisi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan zararlar\u0131n olu\u015fabilece\u011fi kanaat ve de\u011ferlendirmeleri sonucu 17 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 tarihli y\u00fcr\u00fctme kurulu karar\u0131yla 10 Temmuz 2010’da yap\u0131lan s\u0131nav\u0131n E\u011fitim Bilimleri b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn iptal edildi\u011fi kaydedildi.<\/p>\n
S\u0131nav\u0131n E\u011fitim Bilimleri k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda yerel mahkemelerce i\u015flemin hukuka uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle verilen davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131n Dan\u0131\u015ftay 12. Dairesince de onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131lan kararda, “Buna kar\u015f\u0131n idarece Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.” denildi.<\/p>\n
Kararda, bu davan\u0131n ivedi i\u015flerden olmas\u0131 ve dava dosyas\u0131ndaki bilgi ve belgelerin karar i\u00e7in yeterli bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle adli yarg\u0131 nezdinde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma ve muhakemenin sonucunun beklenmesine gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi bildirildi.<\/p>\n
Kararda, \u015fu tespitlere yer verildi:<\/p>\n
“Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Denetleme Kurulu’nun 8 Eyl\u00fcl 2010 tarihli raporu, 29 Aral\u0131k 2014 ve 9 \u015eubat 2015 tarihli T\u00dcB\u0130TAK raporlar\u0131, Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca matematik\u00e7i akademisyen bilirki\u015filere kitap\u00e7\u0131klar \u00fczerinde yapt\u0131r\u0131lan inceleme sonucu d\u00fczenlenen rapor, E\u011fitimde \u00d6l\u00e7me ve De\u011ferlendirme bilirki\u015filerine yapt\u0131r\u0131lan inceleme sonucu haz\u0131rlanan 18 Mart 2015 tarihli rapor ile Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen ve Ankara 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince kabul edilen iddianamede yer alan veriler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ve dava dosyas\u0131ndaki bilgi ve belgelerden gelinen noktada s\u0131nava ili\u015fkin Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr sorular\u0131n\u0131n da iptal edilen E\u011fitim Bilimleri k\u0131sm\u0131 gibi s\u0131navdan \u00f6nce ba\u015fka ki\u015filerin eline ge\u00e7ti\u011fi sonu\u00e7 ve kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Buna g\u00f6re, sorular\u0131n s\u0131navdan g\u00fcnler \u00f6ncesinde s\u0131zd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, sorular\u0131 alan ki\u015filerin ikrar i\u00e7eren ifadeleri ile teknik incelemeler sonucu d\u00fczenlenen bilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131yla sabit oldu\u011fundan 10 Temmuz 2010’da yap\u0131lan KPSS Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131nda hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
– Avukat baban\u0131n hukuk m\u00fccadelesi<\/p>\n
K\u0131z\u0131 tarih b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc mezunu olan ve 2010’daki KPSS’de ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in atanamayan avukat Cemal Ye\u015filyurt, k\u0131z\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131n\u0131n yendi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle hukuk m\u00fccadelesi ba\u015flatt\u0131.<\/p>\n
Kopya nedeniyle ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 dile getiren Ye\u015filyurt, Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn iptal edilmemesi \u00fczerine, bu b\u00f6l\u00fcmdeki s\u0131nav soru ve cevaplar\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fczlerce adaya servis edildi\u011fini savunarak, s\u0131nav\u0131n bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n da iptali istemiyle Ankara \u0130dare Mahkemesi’ne ilk davay\u0131 a\u00e7anlardand\u0131.<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ankara 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, usuls\u00fczl\u00fck iddialar\u0131 nedeniyle daha \u00f6nce “E\u011fitim Bilimleri” b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc iptal edilen 2010 KPSS’nin “Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr” k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 iptal etti. \/ Son Dakika… – Ankara 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 2010 KPSS’nin “Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr” k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin karar\u0131nda, “S\u0131nava ili\u015fkin Genel Yetenek ve Genel K\u00fclt\u00fcr sorular\u0131n\u0131n da iptal edilen E\u011fitim …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":236473,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6663,6155,5005,349,6805],"tags":[41919,12140,39118,44627,137479],"class_list":["post-236472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-egitim","category-gundem","category-manset","category-son-dakika","category-turkiye","tag-2010-kpss","tag-kpss","tag-kpss-2010","tag-kpss-son-dakika","tag-son-dakika-kpss"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236472\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/236473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}