\u00c7etin’in, Be\u015fikta\u015f’taki trafik kazas\u0131nda bir polis memurunun \u015fehit olmas\u0131, birinin de a\u011f\u0131r yaralanmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle, “bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ve bir ki\u015finin yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmak” su\u00e7undan 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne, duru\u015fma savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca itiraz edildi.<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 Ekrem \u015eakar’\u0131n, \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine (\u0130stinaf Mahkemeleri) g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere h\u00fckm\u00fc veren \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7ede, R\u00fczgar \u00c7etin’in T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun (TCK) 85\/2, 22\/3, 50\/4, 62\/1 ve 63. maddeleri gere\u011fince 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc belgesine 1 y\u0131l 6 ay s\u00fcreyle el konuldu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
– “Zarar, tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve failin g\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ama\u00e7 de\u011ferlendirilmeli”<\/p>\n\n
Dilek\u00e7ede, TCK’n\u0131n 85\/2. maddesi ile, “birden fazla insan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ya da bir veya birden fazla ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile birlikte bir veya birden fazla ki\u015finin yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmak” fiiline 2 y\u0131ldan 15 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilerek, TCK’n\u0131n 61. maddesine g\u00f6re, temel ceza belirlenirken su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bi\u00e7imi, su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesinde kullan\u0131lan ara\u00e7lar, i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman ve yer, konusunun \u00f6nem ve de\u011feri, meydana gelen zarar veya tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, failin kast veya taksire dayal\u0131 kusurunun a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, failin g\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ama\u00e7 ve saik gibi hususlar\u0131n g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi aktar\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
Dosyadaki \u015ei\u015fli Etfal E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinin 22 Eyl\u00fcl 2016 tarihli raporuna g\u00f6re, san\u0131k \u00c7etin’in 0,902 promil alkoll\u00fc oldu\u011fu kaydedilen dilek\u00e7ede, “Kaza tespit tutana\u011f\u0131, bilirki\u015fi raporu ve Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Trafik \u0130htisas Dairesinden al\u0131nan rapor i\u00e7eriklerine g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay g\u00fcn\u00fc, y\u00f6netimindeki 34 RUZ 27 plakal\u0131 oto ile \u00c7\u0131ra\u011fan Caddesi’nde seyir halinde iken, Ziya Kalkavan Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lisesi \u00f6n\u00fcndeki trafik \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu kav\u015fa\u011fa yakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, en sa\u011f \u015feritten \u00f6ncelikle orta \u015feride, daha sonra ise \u00f6n\u00fcndeki arac\u0131 sollamak i\u00e7in ani bir manevrayla kar\u015f\u0131 y\u00f6nden gelen ara\u00e7lara ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u015feride tecav\u00fcz etti\u011fi, \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc B B\u00f6lgesi Trafik Denetleme Ekipler Amirli\u011fine ait araca s\u00fcratle \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131, olayda asli kusurlu oldu\u011fu, polis arac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc olan ma\u011fdur Emre Tetik’in kusurunun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olayda bilin\u00e7li taksir ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.” denildi.<\/p>\n
– “Karar, y\u00f6ntem ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131”<\/p>\n\n
San\u0131k \u00c7etin’in, bilin\u00e7li taksirle, g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131ndan \u0130smet Fatih Alag\u00f6z’\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne, Emre Tetik’in ise yaralanmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 aktar\u0131lan dilek\u00e7ede, \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131:<\/p>\n
“Mevcut deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’n\u0131n 85\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, temel ceza belirlenirken su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f bi\u00e7imini, meydana gelen zarar ve tehlike ile taksire dayal\u0131 kusurun a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, bilin\u00e7li taksir ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fundan taksirli su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin cezan\u0131n TCK’n\u0131n 22\/3. maddesi gere\u011fince yine alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131larak artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece TCK’n\u0131n 85\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re temel ceza belirlenirken meydana gelen zarar ve tehlikenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131, ma\u011fdur Emre Tetik’in yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi, taksire dayal\u0131 kusurun a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak, temel cezadan daha fazla uzakla\u015f\u0131larak ceza verilmesi gerekirken olu\u015fa ve dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun olmayacak \u015fekilde asgari hadden daha az uzakla\u015f\u0131larak temel ceza belirlenmi\u015ftir. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle verilen karar\u0131n y\u00f6ntem ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmekle istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 gere\u011fi do\u011fmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n
Dilek\u00e7ede, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131 ve toplanan delillere uygun olarak, daha \u00fcst oran belirlenerek cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi talep edildi.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
R\u00fczgar \u00c7etin’in, “bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ve bir ki\u015finin yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmak” su\u00e7undan 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik karar, \u0130stanbul 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin duru\u015fma savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan “cezan\u0131n \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rdan verilmesi gerekti\u011fi” belirtilerek temyiz edildi. \u00c7etin’in, Be\u015fikta\u015f’taki trafik kazas\u0131nda bir polis memurunun \u015fehit olmas\u0131, birinin de a\u011f\u0131r yaralanmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":240363,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6155,5005,349,6805],"tags":[1748,201364,13199,20401],"class_list":["post-240362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","category-manset","category-son-dakika","category-turkiye","tag-besiktas","tag-ruzgar-cetin","tag-sinan-cetin","tag-trafik-kazasi"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240362\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/240363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}