Avukat Aker \u00c7\u0131tak\u2019\u0131n Be\u015fikta\u015f Postas\u0131\u2019na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama \u015f\u00f6yle;<\/p>\n
\u201cYal\u00e7\u0131n Karadeniz taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davada \u0130stanbul 21. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2017\/174 E. dosyas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi 12\/03\/2019 tarihli iptal karar\u0131yla, hali haz\u0131rda Divan Ba\u015fkan\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla g\u00f6revde olan Sn. Tevfik Yamant\u00fcrk ve Divan Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulu \u00dcyelerinin hukuki me\u015fruiyetleri tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 hale gelmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Mahkeme, bu ki\u015filerin g\u00f6rev ve yetkilerini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a iptal etmi\u015f ve yetkilerinin yasal dayanaklar\u0131n\u0131 15\/04\/2017\u2019den itibaren ortadan kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemenin bu karar\u0131na kul\u00fcb\u00fcn itiraz etme hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r ancak, itiraz a\u015famas\u0131n\u0131n red ile sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 halinde, s\u00f6z konusu Divan Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k \u00dcyelerinin ge\u00e7mi\u015fe d\u00f6n\u00fck b\u00fct\u00fcn i\u015flem ve eylemleri ge\u00e7ersiz olacakt\u0131r. Makam\u0131n bo\u015f kalmamas\u0131 ad\u0131na, itiraz a\u015famas\u0131 sona erene kadar mevcut Divan Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k \u00dcyeleri, bu g\u00f6revlerine \u201cask\u0131da ge\u00e7ersiz\u201d olmak kayd\u0131yla devam edeceklerdir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u015fu anda Divan Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve \u00dcyelerinin, H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay\u2019\u0131n Ba\u015fkan Adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmesi de hukuken \u201cask\u0131da ge\u00e7ersizdir\u201d. Yani \u201cNoterden imza getirmezse H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay\u2019\u0131 se\u00e7ime sokmuyoruz\u201d deme haklar\u0131 T\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019te yoktu, \u015fimdi bir de Mahkeme karar\u0131yla ellerinden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130tiraz a\u015famas\u0131ndan sonra bu ask\u0131 s\u00fcreci kalkacak, Divan Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k \u00dcyeleri g\u00f6revden kesin olarak d\u00fc\u015feceklerdir. \u00dcstelik bu d\u00fc\u015fme, 15\/04\/2017 tarihinden itibaren dikkate al\u0131nacakt\u0131r. Yani 17\/04\/2017\u2019den, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesine kadar Divan Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k \u00dcyelerinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm i\u015flem ve eylemleri, b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle hukuksuz say\u0131lacakt\u0131r; yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 35. maddesinde aday \u00f6nerilerinin Noterden yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na ya da bizzat gelinerek \u0131slak imza verilece\u011fine dair bir kural yoktur. Kural, 250 \u00fcyenin \u0131slak imza ile aday \u00f6nermesinden ibarettir. Hukuk kural\u0131 der ki, bu imzalar\u0131n sahte oldu\u011funa dair bir itiraz veya tespit bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, bu imzalar ger\u00e7ektir ve dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. Team\u00fcl denen \u201cuygulama gelene\u011fi\u201d ise, yaz\u0131l\u0131 kural\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde devreye girer. Ortada apa\u00e7\u0131k yaz\u0131l\u0131 t\u00fcz\u00fck kural\u0131 bulundu\u011funa g\u00f6re, \u201cben illa team\u00fcl\u00fc uygulayaca\u011f\u0131m\u201d diye \u0131srar edemezsiniz. Kald\u0131 ki hangi team\u00fclden bahsediliyor? Team\u00fcl (yani gelenek), kanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde y\u00fczy\u0131llar boyu istikrarla uygulanan kurallara denir. Oysa 250 imza ile aday olma kural\u0131, sadece ge\u00e7en son se\u00e7imde 1 kere uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ! 100 senedir Be\u015fikta\u015f\u2019\u0131n tarihinde 250 imza ile aday \u00f6nerme kural\u0131 yoktu. Sadece 1 kere uygulanm\u0131\u015f gelenek mi olur? Zoraki team\u00fcl yaratamazs\u0131n\u0131z. Ba\u015fka konularda Noterden imza alma veya bizzat gelme gelene\u011fi mi vard\u0131 kul\u00fcpte? \u00dcyelik ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda ki\u015filer bizzat kul\u00fcbe mi geliyor? \u00dcyelik formlar\u0131ndaki \u0131slak imzalar kendilerine mi ait? Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131nda herkesin imzas\u0131 kendisine mi ait ve ger\u00e7ek imzalar\u0131 m\u0131? Metal \u0130\u015f Sendikas\u0131n\u0131n Fenerbah\u00e7eli Bursasporlu \u00fcyeleri kul\u00fcbe al\u0131n\u0131rken \u0131slak imzalar\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131 m\u0131? Bunu bilebiliyor musunuz ve kul\u00fcpte b\u00f6yle bir gelenek var m\u0131? Hay\u0131r! Demek ki olmayan bir gelenek \u00fczerinden, yaz\u0131l\u0131 t\u00fcz\u00fck kural\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmezden gelemezsiniz. Zaten g\u00f6revin me\u015fruiyeti dahi mahkeme karar\u0131 ile ask\u0131da oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re, \u00fczerine bir de T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc uygulamamak b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle hukuksuz olur.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6yle bir durum ileride se\u00e7imi de iptal eder, hatta su\u00e7tur. H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay\u2019\u0131n dilek\u00e7esinin teslim dahi al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n adayl\u0131\u011fa kabul edilmemesi ise ayr\u0131 bir su\u00e7tur. Dilek\u00e7e vermek Anayasal bir hakt\u0131r. Dilek\u00e7eyi alm\u0131yorum demek ise TCK md. 121 uyar\u0131nca su\u00e7tur. Art\u0131k camiam\u0131z\u0131 Mahkeme kap\u0131lar\u0131ndan, \u00e7eki\u015fmeden, ihtilaflardan kurtarmak gerekir. Bunun yolu hukuka, yaz\u0131l\u0131 kurala uymaktan ve sa\u011f duyulu olmaktan, kongre \u00fcyelerinin iradesine itibar ve itimat etmekten ge\u00e7er.\u201d<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Be\u015fikta\u015f\u2019\u0131n eski sporcular\u0131ndan ve kongre \u00fcyelerinden avukat Aker \u00c7\u0131tak, H\u00fcrser Tekinoktay\u2019\u0131n adayl\u0131k ba\u015fvurusunun kabul edilmemesi s\u00fcrecinde ya\u015fananlarla ilgili olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada Divan Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Tevfik Yamant\u00fcrk ve kurul \u00fcyelerinin me\u015fruiyetlerinin, eski ba\u015fkan Yal\u00e7\u0131n Karadeniz\u2019in a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava nedeniyle tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 halde oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Avukat Aker \u00c7\u0131tak\u2019\u0131n Be\u015fikta\u015f Postas\u0131\u2019na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama \u015f\u00f6yle; \u201cYal\u00e7\u0131n Karadeniz taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davada \u0130stanbul …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":277610,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6774,6155,5005,349],"tags":[85969,1748,17641,217398],"class_list":["post-277609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-futbol","category-gundem","category-manset","category-son-dakika","tag-aker-citak","tag-besiktas","tag-hurser-tekinoktay","tag-tevfik-yamanturk"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=277609"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277609\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/277610"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=277609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=277609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=277609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}