\u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ula\u015ft\u0131rma ve Altyap\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen Kanal \u0130stanbul’a ili\u015fkin i\u015f birli\u011fi protokol\u00fcn\u00fcn hukuka uygun oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n
TMMOB’a ba\u011fl\u0131 9 meslek odas\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu i\u015f birli\u011fi protokol\u00fcn\u00fcn iptali istemiyle \u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde 2018’de dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n
Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, protokol\u00fcn konusunun t\u00fcm uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere, Anayasa’ya, \u00c7evre D\u00fczeni Plan\u0131’na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, protokol kapsam\u0131nda tar\u0131m alanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve karasal ekosistemin geri d\u00f6n\u00fclemez \u015fekilde bozulaca\u011f\u0131, do\u011fal ve arkeolojik sit alanlar\u0131n\u0131n, tabiat parklar\u0131n\u0131n yok olaca\u011f\u0131 savunuldu.<\/p>\n
Taraflara y\u00fcklenen g\u00f6revlerin de hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen dilek\u00e7ede, protokol konusu proje alan\u0131n\u0131n, rezerv alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hen\u00fcz s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 belirlenmemi\u015f bir alan\u0131 i\u015faret etti\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hangi hukuki rejime ba\u011fl\u0131 bulundu\u011fu belli olmayan bir alanda t\u00fcm planlama yetkisinin daval\u0131 \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na verildi\u011fi kaydedildi.<\/p>\n
TOK\u0130’nin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri belirlenirken uygulama \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in harcanan bedellerin ayni veya nakdi ta\u015f\u0131nmaz olarak mahsupla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edildi\u011fi belirtilen dilek\u00e7ede, bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015fka bir idareye devrinin mahsupla\u015fma y\u00f6ntemiyle de\u011fil, Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanunu uyar\u0131nca ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilece\u011fi, mal ve hizmet al\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n da Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131labilece\u011fi savunuldu.<\/p>\n
\u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ula\u015ft\u0131rma ve Altyap\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi ise usule y\u00f6nelik ehliyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, esasa y\u00f6nelik de hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddedilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, protokol\u00fcn iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle reddetti.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 idarelerin, meslek odalar\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7ma ehliyetiyle ilgili itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararda, kurulu\u015f belgelerinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmasa bile her meslek kurulu\u015funun \u00e7evreyi ilgilendiren konularla ilgili aynen ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filer gibi subjektif dava ehliyetine sahip oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n
Esasa ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmede ise davac\u0131lar\u0131n, protokol konusu proje alan\u0131n\u0131n, rezerv alan d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hen\u00fcz s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 belirlenmemi\u015f bir alan\u0131 i\u015faret etti\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hangi hukuki rejime ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu belli olmayan bir alanda t\u00fcm planlama yetkisinin daval\u0131 \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na verildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki itiraz\u0131 yerinde bulunmad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Kararda, 6306 say\u0131l\u0131 Afet Riski Alt\u0131ndaki Alanlar\u0131n D\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un ilgili maddeleri de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n riskli alanlardaki ve rezerv yap\u0131 alanlar\u0131ndaki uygulamalarda faydalan\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u00f6zel kanunlar ile \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen alanlara ili\u015fkin olanlar da dahil her t\u00fcr ve \u00f6l\u00e7ekteki planlama i\u015flemlerine esas te\u015fkil edecek standartlar\u0131 belirlemeye, onaylamaya ve kent tasar\u0131mlar\u0131 haz\u0131rlamaya yetkili oldu\u011fu bildirildi.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca, \u0130stanbul’da bulunan baz\u0131 alanlarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilecek proje uygulamalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yetkilendirilmesi yolunda tesis edilen 2012\/3573 say\u0131l\u0131 Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali istemiyle Dan\u0131\u015ftayda a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fi hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesine ait ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n, kanal projesi i\u00e7in belediyenin yetkili organ\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n tahsis edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 da kabul edilmedi.<\/p>\n
Kararda, daval\u0131 \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na verilen yetkilerin, idarelerin b\u00fcnyesinde bulunan birimleriyle yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 sonucunda al\u0131nan kararlar sonucunda ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 mutabakata var\u0131larak belirlenen yetkiler oldu\u011fu ve protokol\u00fcn d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarihten sonraki bir tarihte yetkili karar organ\u0131 olarak belirlenen \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Meclisinin, 12 Ekim 2018 tarihli karar\u0131 ile protokol\u00fcn uygun bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu do\u011frultuda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k i\u00e7ermedi\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n
Protokol konusunun t\u00fcm uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere, Anayasa’ya ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, tar\u0131m alanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve karasal ekosistemin geri d\u00f6n\u00fclemez \u015fekilde bozulaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki itiraz da mahkemece kabul g\u00f6rmedi.<\/p>\n
Protokol\u00fcn, uygulamaya d\u00f6n\u00fck s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin, protokole taraf kurumlar\u0131n tabi olduklar\u0131 kanun ve y\u00f6netmeliklerle tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fekliyle g\u00f6rev alanlar\u0131 ve sorumluluklar\u0131 dahilinde nas\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtilen kararda, “Protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmleriyle orman sahalar\u0131, tar\u0131m alanlar\u0131, su havzalar\u0131, do\u011fal ve arkeolojik sit alanlar\u0131 gibi kendi \u00f6zel mevzuatlar\u0131yla koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f alanlara ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinde meydana gelebilecek aksakl\u0131klar\u0131n da \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilebilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kurumlar\u0131n koordinasyonunun sa\u011flanabilmesinin hedeflendi\u011fi, bu a\u00e7\u0131dan davaya konu protokolde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.” denildi.<\/p>\n
Kararda, ayr\u0131ca “Kald\u0131 ki y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen s\u00fcre\u00e7lerde meydana gelebilecek herhangi bir ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmas\u0131 halinde de menfaatleri ihlal edilenler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davaya konu edilebilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.” ifadesi kullan\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
TOK\u0130’nin y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri belirlenirken uygulama \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in harcanan bedellerin ayni veya nakdi ta\u015f\u0131nmaz olarak mahsupla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edildi\u011fi belirtilerek, bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ba\u015fka bir idareye devrinin mahsupla\u015fma y\u00f6ntemiyle de\u011fil, Kamula\u015ft\u0131rma Kanunu uyar\u0131nca ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilece\u011fi, mal ve hizmet al\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n da Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131labilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki itiraz da mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yerinde bulunmad\u0131.<\/p>\n
Kararda, i\u015f birli\u011fi s\u00fcre\u00e7lerini belirleyen ve t\u00fcm payda\u015flar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de kendi g\u00f6rev alanlar\u0131yla ilgili sorumluluklar \u00f6ng\u00f6ren protokole konu projenin finansman\u0131n\u0131n temini amac\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren d\u00fczenlemelerin TOK\u0130’nin tabi bulundu\u011fu 2985 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun ama\u00e7 ve kapsam\u0131na uygun oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedildi.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, TOK\u0130’nin ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015ftiraki olan \u00f6zel hukuk t\u00fczel ki\u015fili\u011fini haiz Emlak Konut Gayrimenkul Yat\u0131r\u0131m Ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Anonim \u015eirketi’nin de belirlenen bu ama\u00e7 ve kapsamda proje finansman\u0131 teminine y\u00f6nelik olarak payda\u015f belirlenmesinde kamu yarar\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7inde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p>\n
4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kamu \u0130hale Kanunu’na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmas\u0131 durumunda da menfaatleri ihlal edilenler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden gerek ilgili kurumlar nezdinde itiraz gerekse davaya konu edilebilmesi imkan\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belirtilen kararda, “Kamu yarar\u0131 ve hizmetin gereklerine uygun \u015fekilde tesis edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lan dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemektedir.” denildi.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ula\u015ft\u0131rma ve Altyap\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen Kanal \u0130stanbul’a ili\u015fkin i\u015f birli\u011fi protokol\u00fcn\u00fcn iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 reddetti. \u0130stanbul 8. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Ula\u015ft\u0131rma ve Altyap\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen Kanal \u0130stanbul’a ili\u015fkin i\u015f birli\u011fi protokol\u00fcn\u00fcn hukuka uygun …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":284871,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6155,5005,349,6805],"tags":[68437],"class_list":["post-284870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem","category-manset","category-son-dakika","category-turkiye","tag-kanal-istanbul"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=284870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/284870\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/284871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=284870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=284870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=284870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}