{"id":303642,"date":"2024-05-20T19:33:59","date_gmt":"2024-05-20T16:33:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/?p=303642"},"modified":"2024-05-20T19:33:59","modified_gmt":"2024-05-20T16:33:59","slug":"corlu-tren-kazasi-gerekceli-karar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationalturk.com\/tr\/corlu-tren-kazasi-gerekceli-karar\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00c7orlu tren kazas\u0131 davas\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tekirda\u011f’\u0131n \u00c7orlu il\u00e7esinde 25 ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi tren kazas\u0131 davas\u0131nda 9 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 8 y\u0131l 4 ay ile 17 y\u0131l 6 ay aras\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fen hapis cezalar\u0131 almas\u0131, 4 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n da beraatine ili\u015fkin mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. 4 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutuklanmas\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7lanan davan\u0131n 370 sayfal\u0131k gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda, san\u0131klar\u0131n ‘kusur’ ve ‘ihmalleri’ tek tek s\u0131ralan\u0131p, “B\u00fct\u00fcn delillerin birlikte incelenmesi neticesinde, her bir san\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kendi ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, eldeki dava san\u0131klar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan manevi unsurun taksir (basit veya bilin\u00e7li hali) oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n

Edirne’nin Uzunk\u00f6pr\u00fc il\u00e7esinden \u0130stanbul Halkal\u0131’ya gitmek i\u00e7in hareket eden 362 yolcu ve 6 personelin bulundu\u011fu tren, 8 Temmuz 2018’de Tekirda\u011f’\u0131n \u00c7orlu il\u00e7esi Sar\u0131lar Mahallesi yak\u0131nlar\u0131nda raydan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p, devrildi. Kazada 7’si \u00e7ocuk 25 ki\u015fi ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitirdi, 219 ki\u015fi yaraland\u0131. Kazada kusurlu bulunan TCDD 1’inci B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Halkal\u0131 14’\u00fcnc\u00fc Demiryolu Bak\u0131m M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak g\u00f6rev yapan Turgut Kurt, \u00c7erkezk\u00f6y Yol Bak\u0131m \u015eefli\u011fi’nde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan Yol Bak\u0131m ve Onar\u0131m \u015eefi \u00d6zkan Polat, Yol Bak\u0131m \u015eefli\u011fi’nde Hat Bak\u0131m ve Onar\u0131m Memuru Celaleddin \u00c7abuk ile TCDD b\u00fcnyesinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve may\u0131s ay\u0131ndaki y\u0131ll\u0131k umumi muayene raporunda imzas\u0131 bulunan K\u00f6pr\u00fcler \u015eefi \u00c7etin Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m hakk\u0131nda ‘taksirle \u00f6l\u00fcme ve yaralanmaya neden olmak’ su\u00e7undan 2’\u015fer y\u0131ldan 15’er y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 istemiyle \u00c7orlu 1’inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u00c7orlu tren kazas\u0131na ili\u015fkin 9 g\u00f6revliye daha dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131<\/strong><\/h2>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n tutuksuz yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava s\u00fcrerken, \u00c7orlu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, al\u0131nan yeni bilirki\u015fi raporunun ard\u0131ndan soru\u015fturman\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesine karar verdi. Savc\u0131l\u0131k, kazan\u0131n meydana gelmesinde hava durumunun takip edilmemesi, hava durumunun takip edilememesi nedeniyle olumsuz hava ko\u015fullar\u0131nda demir yolu hatt\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel olarak muayene edilememesi, menfezin ve \u00e7evresindeki hat kesiminin gerekli bak\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n, temizli\u011finin, yabani otla m\u00fccadelesinin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131, kaza yeri menfezinin \u0130stanbul istikametindeki b\u00fcz\u00fcn t\u0131kal\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle b\u00fcze gelen ya\u011fmur suyunun aradaki kanal vas\u0131tas\u0131yla kaza menfezine y\u00f6nelmesi nedenlerinin etkili oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi. De\u011ferlendirmenin ard\u0131ndan savc\u0131l\u0131k, kazada sorumluluklar\u0131 bulundu\u011funu anla\u015f\u0131lan TCDD 1’inci B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’ndeki 9 g\u00f6revli hakk\u0131nda da ‘taksirle birden fazla ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ve yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmak’ ve ‘bilin\u00e7li taksirle birden fazla ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne ve yaralanmas\u0131na neden olmak’ su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u00c7orlu 1’inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nde 3 y\u0131ldan 15 y\u0131la kadar hapis istemiyle dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n

TCDD’nin birimleri ‘asli’ kusurlu bulundu<\/strong><\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

S\u00fcren davada olu\u015fturulan bilirki\u015fi heyetinin ek raporunda, ula\u015ft\u0131rma ve yap\u0131 m\u00fchendisli\u011fi b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde kaza nedenleri; ‘kaza yerindeki menfezin hidrolik ve kanat duvarlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yetersizli\u011fi’, ‘balast tabakas\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki koruma tabakas\u0131n\u0131n yetersizli\u011fi’, ‘balast tutucu duvarlar\u0131n eksikli\u011fi’, ‘hat \u00fcstyap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcyerek g\u00f6zleme olanak tan\u0131yacak kadar geni\u015f olmamas\u0131’, ‘olgu \u015fevi boyunca geli\u015fmi\u015f olan yabani bitkilerin \u015fevi zay\u0131flatmas\u0131’, ‘ray k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda uyar\u0131da bulunacak elektronik sistem eksikli\u011fi’ olarak s\u0131raland\u0131. Raporda, “TCDD Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ar-Ge Birimi, Merkez ve 1’inci B\u00f6lge Demiryolu Emniyet ve Risk Y\u00f6netimi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fckleri ile altyap\u0131 ve sanat yap\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 yenilemeden sorumlu ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Yol ve Ge\u00e7it Kontrol Memuru istihdam etmekle sorumlu ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n asli kusurlu olduklar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n

4 san\u0131k tutukland\u0131<\/h3>\n

Davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclen 20’nci karar duru\u015fmas\u0131nda, heyet san\u0131klar\u0131 ‘bilin\u00e7li taksirle birden fazla ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma’ su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131rken, baz\u0131 san\u0131klar i\u00e7in ‘sicil kayd\u0131 takdiri’ indiriminde bulundu. Heyet, d\u00f6nemin TCDD 1’inci B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Nihat Aslan’a 15 y\u0131l, bak\u0131m servis alanlar\u0131ndan sorumlu m\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Levent Meri\u00e7li’ye 9 y\u0131l 2 ay, B\u00f6lge Bak\u0131m Servis M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc M\u00fcmin Karasu’ya 17 y\u0131l 6 ay, Altyap\u0131dan Sorumlu 1’inci B\u00f6lge Bak\u0131m Servis M\u00fcd\u00fcr Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Nizamettin Aras’a 8 y\u0131l 4 ay, m\u00fchendis Tevfik Baran \u00d6nder’e 10 y\u0131l, Demir Yolu Bak\u0131m M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Turgut Kurt’a 16 y\u0131l 3 ay, m\u00fchendis Deniz Parlak’a 9 y\u0131l 2 ay, m\u00fchendis Kubilay Ba\u015fkaya’ya 9 y\u0131l 2 ay ve \u00c7erkezk\u00f6y Yol Bak\u0131m ve Onar\u0131m \u015eefi \u00d6zkan Polat’a 13 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131 verdi. Levent Kaytan, Burhan Ortanc\u0131l, \u00c7etin Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m ve Celalettin \u00c7abuk i\u00e7in de beraat karar\u0131 verildi. Heyet ayr\u0131ca M\u00fcmin Karasu, Nihat Aslan, Turgut Kurt ve \u00d6zkan Polat hakk\u0131nda tutuklama karar\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n

\u00c7orlu 1’inci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 370 sayfal\u0131k gerek\u00e7eli kararda, yaral\u0131lar, \u00f6lenlerin yak\u0131nlar\u0131, g\u00f6rg\u00fc tan\u0131klar\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerine de yer verildi. Kararda, “B\u00fct\u00fcn delillerin birlikte incelenmesi neticesinde, her bir san\u0131k y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kendi ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanaca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, eldeki dava san\u0131klar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan manevi unsurun taksir (basit veya bilin\u00e7li hali) oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle iken her bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ki\u015fisel sorumlulu\u011fu, di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n kusurlar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak yaln\u0131zca kendi kusuru dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Mahkememiz her bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n cezai sorumlulu\u011funu ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f ve kusurlu oldu\u011fu s\u00fcbuta eren san\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kanunun belirledi\u011fi alt ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rlar aras\u0131nda uygun bir cezaya h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Meydana gelen kaza bak\u0131m\u0131ndan herhangi bir kusuru bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan san\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. Dava konusu tren kazas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak 25 ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, 224 ki\u015finin ise de\u011fi\u015fik seviyelerde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkememiz mahkumiyetlerine karar verdi\u011fi san\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temel cezay\u0131 belirlerken, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun karar\u0131nda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere \u00f6ncelikle failin taksirli kusurunun ve olayda meydana gelen zararl\u0131 neticenin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda, faillerin tamam\u0131n\u0131n ‘asli kusurlu’ bulundu\u011fu ve olayda 25 ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, 219 ki\u015finin de\u011fi\u015fik d\u00fczeylerde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan mahkum edilen san\u0131klar\u0131n temel cezalar\u0131nda, asgari 10 y\u0131ldan ba\u015flamak \u00fczere te\u015fdit uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilen san\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, bilin\u00e7li taksire sebebiyet veren etken say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n birden fazla (\u00fc\u00e7 veya d\u00f6rt) oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131narak, Yarg\u0131tay 12’nci Ceza Dairesi’nin kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda, ceza art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131nda 1\/2 oran\u0131 tatbik edilmi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n

Kararda, 15 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, tutuklanan TCDD 1’inci B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Nihat Aslan’a ili\u015fkin, TCDD 1’inci B\u00f6lge Emniyet Kurulu karar tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (detay riski ve di\u011fer kaza nedenlerine ili\u015fkin bilgilendirmeyi i\u00e7eren) alt\u0131nda san\u0131k Nihat Aslan’\u0131n da imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hat \u00fczerindeki tehlike kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 ve risk gruplar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi belirtildi. Kararda, “Sicil listesinde yan ve tali havzaya denk gelen yol kesiminde, 161+600 ila 161+850 km’ler aras\u0131nda hatt\u0131n solunun (g\u00fcneyi) her sene yaz aylar\u0131nda kontrol\u00fc ve a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funun belirtilmesine ek olarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 29.06.2018 tarihli turne raporuna kaza tarihinden \u00f6nce vak\u0131f olup gere\u011fi i\u00e7in ilgili birimlere g\u00f6ndermek suretiyle raporun i\u00e7erdi\u011fi \u015fiddetli ve lokal ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ile demiryolu hasar\u0131na neden olma sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ancak g\u00f6revlerine kar\u015f\u0131 kay\u0131ts\u0131zl\u0131k g\u00f6stererek zararl\u0131 neticeyi kabullendi\u011fine ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin, somut ve nesnel delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde kazal\u0131 hat kesimine yak\u0131n yerlerde benzer nitelikte bir kaza olmamas\u0131na ve talihe g\u00fcvenerek bilin\u00e7li taksirle hareket etti\u011fi, Yarg\u0131tay 12’nci Ceza Dairesi’nin kararlar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ ilkesi gere\u011fince hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin tatbik edilmemesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir” ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

17 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, tutuklanan B\u00f6lge Bak\u0131m Servis M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc M\u00fcmin Karasu’nun kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde lokal ve \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini ve ya\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131n demiryolu hatt\u0131nda hasara yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ancak daha \u00f6nce m\u0131nt\u0131kas\u0131nda benzer nitelikte bir olay ya\u015fanmamas\u0131na ve talihe g\u00fcvenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fi zann\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi belirtildi. Kararda, “Hava durumunu d\u00fczenli takip etmedi\u011fi, hatt\u0131n \u00f6zel kontrol\u00fcn\u00fc (DB M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc ve ba\u011fl\u0131 birimleri taraf\u0131ndan) sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131 ve turne raporu d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, HB El Kitab\u0131n\u0131n \u00dcstyap\u0131 B\u00f6l\u00fcm-6 (Hat Muayenesi) Ek-1 sat\u0131r 65-72 (Olumsuz Hava Ko\u015fullar\u0131nda Hatt\u0131n Kontrol Edilmesi) gere\u011fi sorumlu tutuldu\u011fu \u00f6zel hat kontrol\u00fcn\u00fc ‘d\u00fczenli ve ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131’ bir prosed\u00fcre ba\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6zel hat kontrol\u00fc planlamas\u0131n\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bi\u00e7imde yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun an\u0131lan yaz\u0131 ve raporun geri d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f takibini yapmamas\u0131 ve\/veya bu husustaki sorumlulu\u011fun yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Nizamettin Aras ile tan\u0131k Yasin Baba’ya ait oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmesinden anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 29.06.2018 tarihli turne raporunun da mevzuat gere\u011fi ifa edilen bir turne faaliyeti olup, alt birimlerden yan\u0131t verilmeyen 30.05.2018 tarihli yaz\u0131n\u0131n denetimi anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u00f6ylelikle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131, meydana gelen kaza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bilin\u00e7li taksirli ve asli kusurlu olarak sorumlu oldu\u011fu sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer fail veya faillerin yol bek\u00e7ili\u011fi ve MGM ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi konular\u0131ndaki kusurlar\u0131n\u0131n ise 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK madde 22\/5 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca san\u0131k M\u00fcmin Karasu’nun kusurundan ayr\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, yol bek\u00e7isi ve MGM ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi konular\u0131ndaki eksikliklerin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kusur durumunu bu y\u00f6nden etkilemedi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n daha \u00f6nceki bir tarihte \u00fcst makamlara yol bek\u00e7isi talebinde bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n da hatt\u0131n \u00f6zel kontrol\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kusurunu ortadan kald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zira hatt\u0131n \u00f6zel kontrol\u00fc i\u00e7in yol bek\u00e7isinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u015fart olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yol bek\u00e7isinin yolun daimi nezareti bak\u0131m\u0131ndan elzem ve \u00f6nemli oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n

16 y\u0131l 3 ay hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, tutuklanan Demir Yolu Bak\u0131m M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Turgut Kurt’un yol bak\u0131m ve tamirat\u0131nda y\u0131ll\u0131k i\u015f programlar\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak ve uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak, m\u0131nt\u0131kas\u0131ndaki bak\u0131m ve onar\u0131m \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131na ait belge ve verilerin sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak, mevsim ge\u00e7i\u015flerinde, genel emir kapsam\u0131nda demiryolunun kritik noktalar\u0131nda (conta, makas, kurp, t\u00fcnel vb.) kontrolleri yapt\u0131rarak seyr\u00fcsefer g\u00fcvenli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan gerekli \u00f6nlemleri ald\u0131rmak oldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n

‘Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fi zann\u0131yla hareket etmi\u015f’<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Kararda, \u015f\u00f6yle denildi: “Kendisine bilgi verilen personel olarak olay tarihinde kazal\u0131 hat kesimine ya\u011fd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan \u015fiddetli ya\u011fmur s\u0131ras\u0131nda, sonras\u0131nda hat \u00fczerinde gerekli \u00f6zel kontrol\u00fcn planlamas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nceden yapmamak ve bilahare kontrol\u00fc yapt\u0131rmamak suretiyle tam ve asli olarak kusurlu bulundu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay tarihinde \u0130stanbul’da bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n an\u0131lan sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kendisinin \u00f6zel hat muayenesi planlamas\u0131n\u0131 daha \u00f6nce yaparak ba\u011fl\u0131 personelini hat kontrol\u00fcne y\u00f6nlendirebilece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay tarihinde meydana gelen ya\u011f\u0131\u015fa ili\u015fkin ihbar almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kendisine bu y\u00f6nde formel veya informel kanallardan bilgi gelmedi\u011fi, olay tarihinde MGM ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan MGM mesaj\u0131n\u0131n da gelmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde savunmalarda bulunulmu\u015ftur. S\u00f6z konusu savunmalar\u0131n bi\u00e7imsel olarak do\u011fru oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011fa herhangi bir kanaldan kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi bilgisinin iletilmedi\u011fi ancak olay tarihinden \u00f6nce M\u00fcmin Karasu taraf\u0131ndan yaz\u0131lan 30.05.2018 tarihli yaz\u0131 ve 29.06.2018 tarihli turne raporunun kaza tarihinden \u00f6nce Turgut Kurt’a tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, an\u0131lan yaz\u0131 ve rapor i\u00e7eri\u011finde \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki g\u00fcnlerde \u015fiddetli lokal ya\u011f\u0131\u015flar olabilece\u011fi ve bu t\u00fcr ya\u011f\u0131\u015flar\u0131n hasara yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek hava durumunun takip edilmesi, kritik havalarda n\u00f6bet\u00e7i b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131, ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hallerde yaya kontrollerinin art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fi, kontroller i\u00e7in sicilli yarma ve dolgular belirtilmekle beraber ikaz ve talimat\u0131n bununla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ilgili yaz\u0131 ve turne raporunun san\u0131k Turgut Kurt y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yaz\u0131l\u0131 emir niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k ve bir k\u0131s\u0131m tan\u0131k beyan\u0131ndan olay tarihinden sonra MGM i\u015fbirli\u011fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda telefon uygulamalar\u0131ndan hava durumunun hassas bi\u00e7imde takip edilerek bayram tatillerinde n\u00f6bet uygulamas\u0131yla turne icra edildi\u011finin hatta bu turnelerden bir tanesinde kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f sonras\u0131nda meydana gelen sellenmenin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclendi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca kaza tarihinde olmamakla birlikte zaman zaman sosyal medya \u00fczerinden hava ve yol durumunun takibine ili\u015fkin DBS M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan DB M\u00fcd\u00fcrlerine uyar\u0131lar yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. San\u0131k Turgut Kurt’un kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde lokal ve \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini ve ya\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131n demir yolu hatt\u0131nda hasara yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ancak daha \u00f6nce m\u0131nt\u0131kas\u0131nda benzer nitelikte bir olay ya\u015fanmamas\u0131na ve talihe g\u00fcvenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fi zann\u0131yla hareket ederek hava durumunu takip etmedi\u011fi, hatt\u0131n \u00f6zel kontrol\u00fcn\u00fc (YBO \u015eefi, Yol S\u00fcrveyan\u0131, HBO Memuru taraf\u0131ndan) sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylelikle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131, meydana gelen kaza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bilin\u00e7li taksirli ve asli kusurlu olarak sorumlu oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

Hava durumu detay\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n

13 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, tutuklanan \u00c7erkezk\u00f6y Yol Bak\u0131m ve Onar\u0131m \u015eefi \u00d6zkan Polat’\u0131n hava durumunu takip etmedi\u011fine vurgu yap\u0131ld\u0131. Polat i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131klanan kararda, “Kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde lokal ve \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini ve ya\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131n demiryolu hatt\u0131nda hasara yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ancak daha \u00f6nce m\u0131nt\u0131kas\u0131nda benzer nitelikte bir olay ya\u015fanmamas\u0131na ve talihe g\u00fcvenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fi zann\u0131yla hareket ederek hava durumunu takip etmedi\u011fi, hatt\u0131n \u00f6zel kontrol\u00fcn\u00fc (Yol S\u00fcrveyan\u0131, HBO Memuru ve\/veya kendisi taraf\u0131ndan) sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylelikle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131, meydana gelen kaza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ‘bilin\u00e7li taksirli ve asli kusurlu’ olarak sorumlu oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer fail veya faillerin yol bek\u00e7ili\u011fi ve MGM ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi konular\u0131ndaki kusurlar\u0131n\u0131n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK md. 22\/5 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca san\u0131k \u00d6zkan Polat’\u0131n kusurundan ayr\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, yol bek\u00e7isi ve MGM ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi konular\u0131ndaki eksikliklerin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kusur durumunu bu y\u00f6nden etkilemedi\u011fi kan\u0131s\u0131na var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r” denildi.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcr Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Levent Muammer Meri\u00e7li, 9 y\u0131l 2 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Meri\u00e7li ile ilgili kararda, “San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazal\u0131 menfeze balast tutucu duvar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nerisini i\u00e7eren senelik umumi muayene raporlar\u0131 ile 2018 y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden mahal listesinin kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6z konusu imalat\u0131n bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131na dahil edilmesini ve program\u0131n s\u00fcresinde tamamlanarak ihaleye \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamamak, balast tutucu duvar imalat\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak herhangi bir teklif veya \u00f6neride bulunmamak, bu konuda gerekli teknik ve idari incelemeyi yapmamak suretiyle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bu haliyle basit taksir kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, kendisinin olay tarihi itibar\u0131yla kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde meydana gelen \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ve altyap\u0131da meydana gelen hasar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin, somut ve nesnel delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ ilkesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast veya bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilmemi\u015ftir” ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

Davada altyap\u0131dan sorumlu 1’inci B\u00f6lge Bak\u0131m Servis M\u00fcd\u00fcr Yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 Nizamettin Aras, 8 y\u0131l 4 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Aras’\u0131n gerekli teknik ve idari inceleme yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaydedilen kararda, “San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazal\u0131 menfeze balast tutucu duvar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nerisini i\u00e7eren senelik umumi muayene raporlar\u0131 ile 2018 y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden mahal listesinin kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6z konusu imalat\u0131n bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131na dahil edilmesini sa\u011flamamak, balast tutucu duvar imalat\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak herhangi bir teklif veya \u00f6neride bulunmamak, bu konuda gerekli teknik ve idari incelemeyi yapmamak suretiyle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bu haliyle basit taksir kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f. Kendisinin olay tarihi itibar\u0131yla kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde meydana gelen \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ve altyap\u0131da meydana gelen hasar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin, somut ve nesnel delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ ilkesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast veya bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilmemi\u015ftir” ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Tevfik Baran \u00d6nder’in ceza gerek\u00e7esi<\/strong><\/p>\n

10 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verilen y\u00fcksek m\u00fchendis Tevfik Baran \u00d6nder’in dikkat ve \u00f6zer y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fini kaydedildi. Kararda, “San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazal\u0131 menfeze balast tutucu duvar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nerisini i\u00e7eren senelik umumi muayene raporlar\u0131 ile 2018 y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131na esas te\u015fkil eden mahal listesini kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131p s\u00f6z konusu imalat\u0131n bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131na dahil edilmesini sa\u011flamamak, balast tutucu duvar imal\u00e2t\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak herhangi bir teklif veya \u00f6neride bulunmamak, bu konuda gerekli teknik incelemeyi yapmamak suretiyle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bu h\u00e2liyle basit taksir kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, kendisinin olay tarihi itibar\u0131yla kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde meydan a gelen \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ve altyap\u0131da meydana gelen hasar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin, somut ve nesnel delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ ilkesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast veya bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilmemi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n

Deniz Parlak’\u0131n ceza gerek\u00e7esi<\/strong><\/p>\n

9 y\u0131l 2 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan m\u00fchendis Deniz Parlak’\u0131n dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi belirtilen kararda, \u015funlar kaydedildi:<\/p>\n

“San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazal\u0131 menfezi balast tutucu duvar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nerisini i\u00e7eren senelik umumi muayene raporlar\u0131na itibar etmeyerek mahal listesine d\u00e2hil etmemek, balast tutucu duvar imalat\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak herhangi bir teklif veya \u00f6neride bulunmamak ve ayr\u0131ca ek drenaj muayenelerinin zamanlamas\u0131n\u0131 belirlememek suretiyle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihl\u00e2l etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bu h\u00e2liyle basit taksir kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, kendisinin olay tarihi itibar\u0131yla kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde meydana gelen \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ve altyap\u0131da meydana gelen hasar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin, somut ve nesnel delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ ilkesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast veya bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilmemi\u015ftir”<\/p>\n

Kubilay Ba\u015fkaya’n\u0131n ceza gerek\u00e7esi<\/strong><\/p>\n

9 y\u0131l 2 ay hapis cezas\u0131 alan m\u00fchendis Kubilay Ba\u015fkaya’n\u0131n da dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi kaydedildi. Kararda, “San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kazal\u0131 menfezi balast tutucu duvar yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6nerisini i\u00e7eren senelik umumi muayene raporlar\u0131na itibar etmeyerek mahal listesine dahil etmemek, balast tutucu duvar imalat\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak y\u0131ll\u0131k bak\u0131m (yat\u0131r\u0131m) program\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak herhangi bir teklif veya \u00f6neride bulunmamak ve ayr\u0131ca ek drenaj muayenelerinin zamanlamas\u0131n\u0131 belirlememek suretiyle dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bu haliyle basit taksir kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f. Kendisinin olay tarihi itibar\u0131yla kazal\u0131 hat kesiminde meydana gelen \u015fiddetli ya\u011f\u0131\u015f ve altyap\u0131da meydana gelen hasar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin dosya kapsam\u0131nda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin, somut ve nesnel delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ ilkesi gere\u011fince san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast veya bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00fck\u00fcmleri tatbik edilmemi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n