Anadolu 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi, aralar\u0131nda Dilan Polat ile e\u015fi Engin Polat’\u0131n da oldu\u011fu 5’i tutuklu san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 9 A\u011fustos’ta yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayl\u0131k tutukluk incelemesinde t\u00fcm san\u0131klar\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n
Bunun \u00fczerine Dilan Polat’\u0131n avukat\u0131 Sevin\u00e7 Horoz, Anadolu 8. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine tutuklulu\u011fa itiraz dilek\u00e7esi sundu.<\/p>\n
Talebi de\u011ferlendiren mahkeme, san\u0131k Polat’\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n vas\u0131f ve mahiyeti, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar i\u00e7in kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n alt ve \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131, dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki mevcut deliller ve al\u0131nan ifadelerle MASAK taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor i\u00e7eri\u011fi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n vasf\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k lehine de\u011fi\u015fmesi ihtimali bulundu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n
Tutukluluktan elde edilecek faydan\u0131n bu a\u015famada adli kontrol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile de sa\u011flanabilecek olmas\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alan mahkeme, Polat’\u0131n tahliyesini kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n
Mahkeme, Polat hakk\u0131nda “yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131” \u015feklinde adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin karar\u0131 Polat’\u0131n tutuklu bulundu\u011fu Marmara Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu’na g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n
Polat’\u0131n, i\u015flemlerin ard\u0131ndan bug\u00fcn cezaevinden tahliye edilmesi bekleniyor.<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul merkezli 6 ilde 1 Kas\u0131m 2023 ve devam\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen operasyonlarda, Dilan Polat ve e\u015fi Engin Polat’\u0131n da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu 24 \u015f\u00fcpheli g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Dilan Polat, Engin Polat ve Sinem S\u0131la Do\u011fu’nun da aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphelilerden 16’s\u0131 tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, hakimlik, 27 \u015firkete kayyum atanmas\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011fi, 14 Haziran’daki ayl\u0131k tutukluluk incelemesinde, Dilan Polat’\u0131n karde\u015fleri Can ve Sinem S\u0131la Do\u011fu ile Can Polat, G\u00f6kay Bekar, Halit Polat, Harun Abak, Metin Y\u0131lmaz, Mustafa \u00d6zalp, Nilg\u00fcn Y\u0131lmaz, U\u011furcan Ayy\u0131ld\u0131z ve Zekai Tepe’nin adli kontrol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131p tahliye edilmesine h\u00fckmetmi\u015f, di\u011fer 5 \u015f\u00fcphelinin tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n
Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca haz\u0131rlanan iddianamede, yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yollardan edinilen paralar\u0131n “so\u011fuk c\u00fczdan y\u00f6ntemi”yle sisteme sokulmadan transfer edilerek aklamaya tabi tutuldu\u011fu, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn s\u00f6z konusu faaliyetler s\u0131ras\u0131nda k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede ula\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6hret ve tan\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131k sayesinde bir k\u0131s\u0131m ger\u00e7ek ticari faaliyetlerde de bulundu\u011fu, bu sayede aklama su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n en belirgin y\u00f6n\u00fc olan takip ve kontrol\u00fcn zorla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131l\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
Delillerle sabit olan yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bahisten gelen paran\u0131n perdelenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, zenginle\u015fmenin ger\u00e7ek bir ticaretten kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 imaj\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in birden \u00e7ok \u015firketin kuruldu\u011fu anlat\u0131lan iddianamede, bu \u015firketlerin faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekte olmayan i\u015f ve i\u015flemlere ili\u015fkin sahte faturalar\u0131n d\u00fczenlenip kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kanunen tutulmas\u0131 gereken defterler d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda harici gizli kay\u0131tlar\u0131n tutuldu\u011fu belirtiliyor.<\/p>\n
\u0130ddianamede, soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nan 31 \u015firketin ve bu \u015firketlerin sahip oldu\u011fu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz, ara\u00e7 ve benzeri t\u00fcm mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcsadere edilip m\u00fclkiyetin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesi de talep ediliyor.<\/p>\n
Dilan ve Engin Polat’\u0131n “su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla \u00f6rg\u00fct kurma, y\u00f6netme”, “su\u00e7tan kaynaklanan mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerini aklama” ve “Futbol ve Di\u011fer Spor M\u00fcsabakalar\u0131nda Bahis ve \u015eans Oyunlar\u0131 D\u00fczenlenmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a muhalefet” su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan toplam 20’\u015fer y\u0131ldan 40’ar y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 istenen iddianamede, di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcphelilerin de farkl\u0131 su\u00e7lardan de\u011fi\u015fen oranlarda hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan onaylanan iddianame, g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Anadolu 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapma konusunda yetkili mahkemenin a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi oldu\u011fu belirtilerek iade edilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
\u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n “g\u00f6revli mahkemenin temel cezaya g\u00f6re belirlenebilir oldu\u011fu, art\u0131r\u0131m maddesinin mahkemenin g\u00f6revini belirlemede esas olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” vurgulanarak yap\u0131lan itiraz Anadolu 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince kabul edilmi\u015fti. Mahkeme, davan\u0131n ilk duru\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n 4 Eyl\u00fcl’de yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015fti.
\n